“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”…
So… The First Congress mad a huge mistake by making freedom of religion the first right mentioned because is is firmly established that no matter which religion or religion in its entirety is studied that religion is false. You can disagree and government will support both religion and your disagreement even though that’s a grave contradiction. religion exists because there are unknowns. There are hopes and dreams but there is a antidote for religion. Metaphysically religion is based on an unknown existence. Mysticism, not existence. Epistemologically religion is based on fantasy, not reason and ethically religion is based on socialism, not capitalism and as such religion is truelly against human life. Despite all the proofs of God which are all logically flawed Congress is prohibited from prohibiting the protection of God because God is so central to so many religions. Not all religions because some religions are not based on God or the existence of a God. So what’s wrong with being prohibited from say removing religion from the public sphere? It forbids the correction of a huge metaphysical, epistemological and ethical error. Being prohibited from correcting an error espacially one as large as the metaphysical error of religion establishes the basis for correcting error itself. If there is an error like, for example hatred of white people the argument to stop the hate is undermined by the prohibition to stop the error which allows the error to continue. Same for the abridgement of speech which means hate speech is protected which means the hatred of hate speech is also protected so we are left with the burdens of both religion which is false and hate speech which is not only allowed but protected. You can be punishe for tryiong to stop hate speech. So even if you hate hate speech because it’s hateful you cannot stop hate speech which in effect allows hate speech and hate itself to continue. Is that such a bad thing? Actually, no. It’s actually good to protect hate speech because protecting hate speech allows you to identify your enemies and before you can proceed agaisnt your enemies you have to identfy them and you can do that if you listen to their hate speech.
Views: 1
