House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte said Obama’s immigration policies are creating “a sanctuary for tens of thousands of criminal aliens.”
“The American public has been misled by the enforcement priorities, deferred action, and executive action policies of Obama, which categorize only certain so-called ‘serious’ criminal aliens as worthy of detention and then removal,” Goodlatte said in a statement. “Despite its rhetoric, the fact remains that the Obama Administration continues to willingly free dangerous criminal aliens, allowing them to continue to prey upon communities across the United States.”
“The Obama Administration “grossly misrepresented” the number of crimes the criminal aliens it released from custody in FY 2014 subsequently committed by nearly tenfold, the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) charges.
According to FAIR, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) records the Immigration Reform Law Institute (IRLI) obtained via a Freedom of Information Act (FIOA) request on FAIR’s behalf reveal that the 30,558 criminal aliens ICE released in FY 2014 committed 13,288 additional crimes.
The number of subsequent convictions contained in FIOA documents is far higher 10 times higher than the 1,423 additional offenses ICE reported to the House Judiciary Committee last July. Liars. Obama Liars.
How about Hillary? In a 9-page letter dated yesterday and posted to his blog, Harvard MBA Charles Ortel called the Clintons’ charity the “largest unprosecuted charity fraud ever attempted,” adding for good measure that the Clinton Foundation is part of an “international charity fraud network whose entire cumulative scale (counting inflows and outflows) approaches and may even exceed $100 billion, measured from 1997 forward.” Ortel lists 40 potential areas of fraud or wrongdoing that he plans to expose over the coming days.
Forty? Forty areas of Fraud? The fraud begins with calling Clinton’s Super PAC a charity. This family enterprise was set up as a global shakedown operation, designed to finance and nurture the Clintons’ continued political ambitions. It’s a Hillary super Bribe and Deliver Government Funds operation. She and Bill would get legislation, grants and other taxpayer money sent to those who paid their bribes to Hillary.
Look at the increase in arms sales to nations that gave millions to the Foundation. You cannot deny that there is a pattern here, one that should have everyone–Democratic and Republican–pondering the ethical ramifications of the power couple’s other ventures. We have a woman who could be the next president of the United States, whose family runs one of the largest, most influential non-profits that runs an illicit bank to cash in and give out favors from wealthy donors––both foreign and domestic.
Even MSNBC’s Chris Matthews had a moment of clarity when he said it’s clear that when you give money to the Clintons, you want something in return. That could come in the form of trade agreements, arms deals, or a screening station in Abu Dhabi that would allow passengers to be cleared prior to entry into the United States. Oh, and this was after the bribing nation paid your husband a $1 million bribe for two nonsense speeches on tourism and climate change; trips that were arranged by you, Mrs. Clinton and your then-State Department staff. Another layer of the onion rests with the alleged $2 million doled out by the Foundation’s network to a for-profit company run by friends of the Clintons. Under federal law, non-profit, tax-exempt organizations aren’t supposed to act upon private interests, though we all know the Clintons play by their own rules. That’s the problem. She should be indicited, perhaps she should already be in jail of at least out on bail.