On the presumption that Obama really does want to help America and Europe in the negotiations with Iran, there are many strategies to do that. For example, instead of lifting all of the sanctions lift one or two and demand Iran show some good faith by revealing something like, for example, how much yellowcake they have?

The point is to use the tactics Iran and the Palestinians successfully have used. Chip away at their demands ; buy more and more time and when they have very little left with which to negotiate, string along the negotiations. Let the negotiations run into September, then December, then 2016 and into 2017 when Obama will no longer be in office instead of and all or nothing approach which the Iranians will violate as fast as they can.

Obama isn’t very skilled in negotiations. He characterized the negotiations as either a good deal for Iran or no deal at all. Netanyahu, in his address to both houses of the US Congress on March 3, 2015, said: “Now we’re being told that the only alternative to this bad deal is war. That’s just not true. The alternative to this bad deal is a much better deal.” Netanyahu’s knows the Iranians. His concise knowledge of Iran’s aims and methods would lead us to conclude that an even better deal would be no deal at all. Continue the pressure on Iran until it abandons its nuclear program, its long-range missile programs and its designs on other Middle East countries. The problem is: Obama doesn’t want to fight against terrorism but to give into the demands of the Terrorists and throw Israel under the bus.

The civilized world cannot let that happen.

Hits: 12