They reported a load of details about the UCLA shooter except that he was Muslim. Why did they leave that point out of their reports? Lets see, they know something is true but leave the true fact out of “the report”. What’s the technical term for that?
The Lying L.A. Times headline claims the shooter was outraged from the hard work of studying. Quote: “For UCLA shooter Mainak Sarkar, sudden rage after years of intense academic studies”. That’s the headline from a “report” by four reporters. They are promoting years of hard study caused Sarkar to murder people. That’s one of the most outlandish and bizarre statements about a Muslim murderer that could be imagined by some infantile febrile minds anxious to support the war of terror against America by ISIS.