And Obama is keeping up his rhetoric and illegal, unconstitutional commands. Here’s the actual law he’s violating: “Congress shall make no law infringing the right to keep and bear arms” but Obama is also banning certain kinds of bullets. Bullets are Arms. A gun without a bullet is like a woman who’s not pregnant. Neither works as intended.
Bullets are arms. The NRA exists to keep government from violating the Constitution regarding the 2nd Amendment. So far, government is winning which means the people are losing one of their basic Rights, the Right to own a gun, a Right that includes bullets.
Obama opposes and probably hates anyone “who does not support common-sense gun reform”. Common Sense Gun Reform are the code words for banning more and more guns, bullets, gun shows and legitimate stores that sell guns and bullets.
Obama supports the bullet ban because he predicts the .223 caliber, (that’s 22 caliber meaning the width of the bullet) M855 ammunition will be used to pierce law enforcement officer armor, although there are no such reported cases to date. None, nada, nyet zero. In addition it infringes the right to own a gun.
HILLARY CLINTON: “I have been for the Brady (Gun Ban) bill; I have been against assault weapons, (Rifles). I have voted not to give gun makers and sellers immunity.” Hillary may even be worse than Obama. She has come out this campaign in favor of gun control measures with a vigor that surprised even some Democrats, targeting minorities and urban voters. Groups bankrolled by billionaire Michael Bloomberg, and former U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords’ super PAC, are spending millions to remove the restrictions against government disarming the people.
Australia recently disarmed their people in one week. Gun owners in Australia were forced to surrender all of their personal firearms to be destroyed.
The results are in: Australia-wide, homicides are UP 3.2 percent; Australia-wide, assaults are UP 8.6 percent; Australia-wide, armed robberies are UP 44 percent (yes, 44 percent). In the state of Victoria, homicides with firearms are UP 300 percent. Figures over the previous 25 years show a steady decrease in armed robbery with firearms (changed drastically in the past 12 months). There has been a dramatic increase in break-ins and assaults of the elderly.”
Surprise, surprise! How can this kind of result occur when the “superior” intellects of governments worldwide have told us repeatedly that gun ownership and gun availability are the reasons so many shooting deaths occur, and why so much crime occurs. Leftist Liberals shout the same tired slogans, telling Americans night after night after night that we could achieve Paradise on Earth if we would only force everyone to give up their guns. The Liberal Mass Media is also pouring forth the same nightly nonsense.
Hillary keeps telling people she they doesn’t want to confiscate guns, but she keeps praising gun control laws in countries that have confiscated people’s guns. Hillary Clinton’s claims that confiscation made them safer but that’s completely wrong.
Speaking at Keene State College in New Hampshire, Clinton was asked: “should government try to take away everyone’s handguns, as Australia did. Clinton praised Australia’s gun buyback in 1996 and 1997, when the government outlawed guns and then used NAZI style registration lists to identify people who owned these newly prohibited weapons. Clinton praised Canada and the UK, which used similar NAZI style registration laws to confiscate guns. President Obama has been praising those laws.
On Friday, Clinton mocked people who worried about confiscation. She said people get scared into thinking that “a black helicopter is going to land in the front yard and somebody is going to take your guns.”
But why should gun owners trust her when she praises other country’s confiscation efforts? She thinks that Canada, Australia, and the UK are safer because of their strict gun laws, even when the evidence shows the opposite. And the Federal Government owns a lot of Black Helicopters