Democrat Socialists Are Really Communists

Let’s get this out right up front: there is no such thing as a democratic socialist. That’s a term invented to hide what people who call themselves democratic socialists actually are.

They’re communists.

Oh, they’ll tell you it isn’t the same thing. That’s one of an unbroken string of lies they tell you, because lies are all these people have.

And a pretty good tell where that’s concerned is to look at the resumes of practically every single one of the people who are rapidly taking over the Democrat Party in primary election after primary election.

What you’ll find is that these are people who literally lie for a living.

There are no plumbers or electricians or carpenters among these champions of the working class who are giving the Democrats a red — red in the classical political sense; not red in the network media-assigned R vs. D electoral sense — makeover. They’re all academics with degrees in “___ Studies” and community organizers, which is a term of art used to describe professional agitators.

Make no mistake, by the way. These are the people who will run the Democrat Party in the future.

Darializa Avila Chevalier for example is an American community organizer and member of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA). Backed by NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani, she secured a major upset victory to become the Democratic nominee for the U.S. House in New York’s 13th Congressional District (covering Upper Manhattan and the West Bronx)

Get any of these people talking about what they do, and it’s rare any of them can get 60 seconds into describing their occupation before they’ve told at least two major, provable lies.

Danes and Norwegians will tell you in no uncertain terms that theirs are capitalist countries with robust private sectors. They’ve got very large welfare states, to be sure, and confiscatory tax structures which stratify their social ranks and make entrepreneurship quite difficult.

And they’ve also got very homogenous demographics, too. The Danes are not all Danes, but they’re almost all white Europeans.

And if you point this out and ask the “democratic socialists” who claim they simply want to make us all Danes whether they’re then for getting rid of all the people whose cultures don’t match up with our own, much less Danish culture, they’ll call you a racist.

The lies are so pervasive that they’re absurd. Queers for Palestine is absurd. Feminists supporting sexually confused men in girls’ locker rooms are absurd. Defunding the police is absurd, not just because it will enable crime — which they want, as anarcho-tyranny is the chosen form of communist revolution in the aftermath of the Soviet Union’s collapse — but because rule by the criminal class isn’t the ultimate result which flows from defunding the police.

Citizen militias, vigilantism and lynching are.

Some of them are honest. For example, check out the guy at the end of this video…

If they’re “democratic socialists” and that’s different from communism, then why are these people always shilling for Cuba? Why do they soft-sell China? Those are communist countries.

Well, China is considerably more fascist than communist now, at least in the sense that fascism’s founders intended to run an economy nearly exactly like China runs its own.

What’s the difference between democratic socialism and communism? Time. That’s all.

Listen to these people long enough, and what they want is to use a period of democratic socialism to usher in the communist state. They want to abolish private property altogether. Listen to Zohran Mamdani and he’ll tell you that government can solve any problem, no matter how big, and that no problem is too small for government to take on. Then he fails to shovel the snow in the winter and demands New York City residents keep their thermostats at 78 in the summer.

They’ll call that democratic socialism. When they start arresting you for setting the thermostat at 74, that’s communism. Or when they’ve run all the landlords in New York out of business and turned the entire city into a giant public-housing slum, so that they can evict you for setting the thermostat at 74, or when there is no thermostat and you get what Zohran Mamdani gives you, that’s also communism.

And anyone who believes the descent into communism from democratic socialism is not inevitable is precisely the kind of idiot the democratic socialists are counting on, not to mention manufacturing in the schools and other cultural institutions. When they aren’t importing them from the Third World.

Make no mistake, by the way. These are the people who will run the Democrat Party in the future. Most Democrat voters don’t want it — most don’t actually know what they want at all; the only message they’ve even heard from their politicos for a decade is what a pedophile, felon, racist and Nazi Donald Trump is, and one reason the communists are taking over that party is that Democrat voters are no longer motivated by manifestations of Trump Derangement Syndrome on MSNOW; they’re looking for somebody to present solutions, and the only people who have anything to offer are the grifters and demagogues of the DSA.

Who by the way scare the hell out of the old-school Democrats.

Melissa and I had a Spectacle Podcast segment on Thursday talking about a video clip making the rounds in which Rahm Emanuel is now lamenting the DSA takeover of his party, and complaining at how on issue after issue — one he brings up is the transgender insanity that his party has embraced — has just been taken over by radicals. Melissa noted, and she’s correct, that Rahm Emanuel is the wrong person to complain.

After all, Emanuel was part of Bill Clinton’s inner circle, which signified his status as a “moderate” Democrat, at least potentially, and then he gleefully threw in with Barack Obama — who is now being reinvented as a moderate by some when he was nothing short of a communist radical. Emanuel’s fellow Chicago political thug David Axelrod is out there pimping for every DSA grifter he can find. Who are these people shedding crocodile tears for the loss of the moderate Democrat Party? It hasn’t existed for a couple of decades now.

What they’re lamenting isn’t the ideology. Rahm Emanuel is upset that mayor of Chicago was his terminal velocity in politics. He thinks it sucks that there will be different people who’ll run things and those people won’t ask his advice anymore. And sure, he’s smart enough to know that once the communists take over the Democrat Party it’s going to be utterly dead in the water outside of the big blue cities — and the big blue cities will go completely to seed when the Karen Basses, Brandon Johnsons, and Zohran Mamdanis are finished driving all of the kulaks to the suburbs — or states where it would be unthinkable for some candy-assed theater kid who’s never had a real job to tell a working man what temperature he can set his thermostat to.

The “liberals” — and at this point I demand that people like my friend John Hawkins stop calling the Left as a whole “liberals,” because there is nothing liberal left in Democrat Party politics — were too weak to hold their party. It has fallen to the communists. The liberals are essentially South Vietnam; their traditional Jefferson-Jackson Dinner is now, as Saigon became Ho Chi Minh City, destined to become the Lenin-Mao Dinner. American liberalism is defunct, and the liberals are being re-educated before our eyes.

Maybe some of that rump faction will finally grow up and become conservatives and help to save America from communism. Maybe.

But the thing to remember about communism — the saying uses socialism as its predicate, but either works — is that you can vote yourself into it but you have to shoot your way out.

Because the DSA gang generally doesn’t present much in the way of physicality. It’s mostly a lot of scrawny little girls with screechy voices winning these elections. But don’t let that fool you. They’re only for democracy so long as it gets them where they want to go. The minute they can park that car, they get out and set it on fire.

In the 20th century these same people, or their ideological forebears, had a saying: one man, one vote, one time.

The only thing the current crowd would object to is the “sexism” of one man.

The rest they’ll happily enforce with violence.

Which is when there will be no further distinctions made between democratic socialism and communism. That will be one lie they’ll stop telling, but it’ll likely be the only one.

Views: 1