No deal based on deception is valid. It’s an invalid contract. It’s void ab initio to use some legal jargon which means it was never a valid agreement.  Both parties must negotiate in good faith but bribing Iran with $1.7 billion delivered on pallets in cash makes the entire deal invalid. 

  • An invalid contract is a general term to refer to a contract that cannot be enforced for any number of reasons, such as duress, containing illegal promises, insufficient consideration, fraud in the inducement, or basically any aspect of the agreement that can invalidate part or all of the contract.

The Los Angeles Times reported: “Republicans have decried the payments as ransom, a charge the Obama administration has rejected. On Tuesday, a group of Republican senators announced their support for legislation that would bar payments from the Judgment Fund to Iran until Tehran pays the nearly $55.6 billion that U.S. courts have judged that it owes to American victims of Iranian terrorism.

“President Obama’s disastrous nuclear deal with Iran was sweetened with an illicit ransom payment and billions of dollars for the world’s foremost state sponsor of terrorism,” said Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), the bill’s primary sponsor.

Rep. Ed Royce (R-Fullerton), chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, also introduced a bill that prohibits cash payments to Iran and demands transparency on future settlements.

“Sending the world’s leading state sponsor of terror pallets of untraceable cash isn’t just terrible policy,” Royce said. “It’s incredibly reckless, and it only puts bigger targets on the backs of Americans. … This cash bonanza has emboldened Iran’s radical regime, and undermined America’s national security.”

Views: 14