A recent push for non-trans-people was a group who held up signs at a soccer stadium with XX-XY signs meant to support sports for biological sexes only which would ban males who want to compete against women. Males have more testosterone which gives them a physical advantage hence they can win against females. They were forcibly removed. Was their removal justified? Correct? Yes.. Of course because it was an assault to the senses. Assault is wrong. They may have been correct but that’s not the issue. While there is a Right to Protest it is a Right limited to protesting government. A soccar match is not government even if it takes place on government property. Changing the minds of fans is not the same as changing the minds of lawmakers. My opinion is trans people are different than non-trans and that has to be recognized and taken into accound in contests. There are more than two sexes when the variations are taken into account and males can take physical advantage of females so it is proper to limit sports to males and females. Trans people can compete with other trans people but admittedly there are insufficient numbers of them to form into teams that can compete. That’s another reason to keep them out of male and female sports.
Views: 0
