Autism is not a set of special powers as Greta believes they are. Greta does not possess special intellectual abilities. Autistic brains do not function like brains should function. If Albert Einsein comes to a conclusion it has a high possibility of being correct. The conclusions of Greta Thunberg can not carry that weight.
The ways people think are varied but there are thinking ways that are beneficial and ways that are harmful. Arriving at a correct conclusion is what reasoning ia about. There is good, indifferent and bad reasoning. There are billions of thoughts and lots of ways to think correct and wrong which means coming to the wrong conclusions. Greta reached a series of wrong conclusions that have unfortunately been pushed by those who agree with her conclusions without the necessary proof her conclusions are correct.
Climate change is serious stuff and is a topic with a broad range of very different conclusions. To use a 16 year old autistic young woman to support unproven conclusions is a dis-service to her. If she is correct she is unable to prove it. If she is wrong she is unable to know it. She has Autism, a brain-based issue that should but hasn’t been used to prove her conclusions are correct. Because she has been diagnosed with Autism her conclusions are suspicious. Taking them at face value has mis-served not only her but for example the editors at Time magazine which appropriated her to push their mis-begotten agenda because her agenda and their agenda are similiar. Unfortunately neither Time nor Thunberg are able to overcome the objections against their conclusions so they simply ignore them. Thunberg has made things more confused and caused many more severe emotional reactions.
Views: 6
