It’s official with the Mueller report that Hillary Clinton and her supporters misled America by claiming the White House was stolen from her. She started the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax and her claims, aided by the Obama White House and magnified by a thoroughly partisan media, by partisan Hollywood and the national Democratic Party set in motion a wild-goose chase.

The chase undermined a duly elected president and cost taxpayers more than $30 million for a severely biased investigation that was forced to agree that Hillary and Barack’s accusations were flat-out false.

In a perfect world, or if the Dark Hillary were a better person, she would apologize profusely  and publicly acknowledge Trump’s legitimacy. Don’t hold your breath.

Hillary should be shunned. period She has no credibility to speak on any issue or endorse any candidate. She has put the nation through hell because she lost an election she thinks she should have won.

Remember this too. Hillary’s campaign actually did work with Russians, through FusionGPS and British agent Christopher Steele and little John McCain, to create a fictional scenario about Trump being compromised.

Which brings us to today’s Democrats. These sleazy crap-weasels bought into Clinton’s Big Lie and built a house of cards on smoke and mirrors. The collapse is total.

If they had any sense, they, too, would accept the Mueller findings and get to work developing serious policy alternatives. Adopting the path of the resistance movement — no compromise, no negotiation — is no longer viable. It, too, is dead.

Remember also Meryl Streep, that viscous vindictive harridan who also condemned our president. Pox’s and germs upon her.  

The long list of 2020 candidates are suddenly facing the fact that Mueller cannot help them. In fact, Trump is stronger and will be emboldened for having survived the gantlet.

Sadly, the first indication is that the party’s loudest huffers and puffers — Adam Schiff, Jerry Nadler, Maxine Waters and assorted other quacks and odd ducks — will not accept that the world has changed. They prove evil exists. They prove Satan is with us and it’s them.

Was the initial decision to investigate Trump’s campaign an attempt to rig the election in favor of Clinton, and when that failed, overthrow a duly elected president? Suggested answer: Yes…

Those outstanding issues are as worthy of complete answers as those that Mueller investigated. In addition to knowing whether there was an improper relationship between a candidate and a foreign power, Americans also deserve to know what was going on inside their own government and whether it was simply incompetent, thoroughly corrupt, or some combination of the two.

Put another way: What did President Barack Obama and his administration do, and why did they do it?

The task of finding out falls to the new attorney general, William Barr. He will have to decide how much of the Mueller report can legally be made public and explaining his decision to Congress.

that’s important but Barr must not be consumed by it. He needs to deliver on a promise he made during his Senate confirmation hearings. He said he was alarmed by the demonstrated bias against Trump by top FBI agents such as Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, and suggested he was not satisfied the FBI and the Justice Department had been fully held accountable.

The key sequence involved questions from the Judiciary panel’s Republican chairman, Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina.

Graham: “Do you promise me as attorney general — if you get this job — to look and see what happened in 2016?”

“Yes, Mr. Chairman,” Barr replied.

“How do these statements sit with you?” Graham asked, referring to the Page and Strzok texts showing they hated Trump and wanted Clinton to win the election.

“I was shocked when I saw them,” Barr answered.

Graham: “Please get to the bottom of it … we’re relying on you to clean this place up.”

Getting to the bottom of it would mean a criminal probe of Comey and his former deputy, Andrew McCabe, along with others in the leadership ranks of the FBI. Did they, as it appears, fail to disclose to the court that Clinton’s team commissioned and paid for the Russian dossier and that its allegations were unverified when they sought approval to spy on the Trump campaign?

If the answers are yes, they may have committed felonies, as did those who authorized any misleading court applications, including Rosenstein.

A criminal probe would also mean uncovering any role played by the reprehensible John Brennan, then head of the CIA, James Clapper, head of national intelligence, Susan Rice, Obama’s national security adviser, and the former president Barack Obama and Valerie Jarrett in creating the FBI probe and leaking classified information.

Trump slamed McCabe for planning ‘very illegal’ act against the presidency

Among the questions they need to be asked under oath is, did you have any role in spreading the Clinton-funded dossier to the media? Did you leak the names of Trump associates picked up on wiretaps?

In addition, of course, there are also fundamental doubts about the integrity of the FBI’s investigation of Clinton’s handling of classified emails. The doubts include what role Attorney General Loretta Lynch and others in the Obama administration played in the wrongful exoneration of Clinton.

Because there are so many questions about the Clinton case and the origins of the Trump probe, the best and only fair solution is for Barr to appoint a new special counsel. Given the critical issues involved, even-handedness demands a prober free of conflicts with the former officials cited.

Unlike the Mueller probe, which ranged too far and took too long, this investigation should be focused on credible allegations against Clinton and top officials of the Obama administration. And it must be completed before the 2020 election so voters can know the whole story of what happened in 2016 and the early days of the Trump presidency before they vote again.

Then, and only then, can we say that our long national nightmare is over.

.

.

Views: 14