Newly elected bysexual, Democrat, Code Pink Activist, Taliban Sympathizer, Freakazoid Arizona Sen. Kyrsten Sinema refused to be sworn in on a Bible, opting, instead, to place her right hand on a law book that included the U.S Constitution and the Arizona Constitution and without explaining her bisexuality or her views and attitudes against religion. Someone who refuses to touch a bible is outside the bounds of normal people. In fact, no book is needed to take an oath. What’s needed, all that’s needed, is for the oath to be witnessed by a appropriate person. You can put your hands in your pockets when you take an oath. 

The U.S. Code Title 28 Part I Chapter 21 § 453 reads: Oaths of justices and judges… Each justice or judge of the United States shall take the following oath or affirmation before performing the duties of his office: “I, ___ ___, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as ___ under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.” No mention of holding one’s hands at all. In fact one could sit and watch tv while reciting the oath and meet all of the requirements.

Oath of Office
Historical Highlight May 21, 1789
The Oath of Office Bill…. A Historic Change in the Oath of Office
“The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.”. That’s from the U.S. Constitution, Article VI, clause 3

Sinema is only the second member of the Senate to identify as LGBTQ. That’s so unusual that it’s been noted constantly by the media.

She seems prone to getting mixed up. Despite her current claim to love the U.S. Constitution, in her work with left-wing groups in the early 2000s, Sinema was far less solicitous of the law of the land. In fact, she was quoted in 2002 as saying she thought it was acceptable that anarchists and Antifa types perpetrated violence, carried weapons, and destroyed property in pursuit of the extremist goals.

Views: 17