Van Jones, the black man who was forced out of the Left wing Obama adminstration called the Trump election a “White-Lash”. In many ways he was exactely right. Too many non-black people who have been or who feel victimized by the Left-Wing Social Justice Warriors who have made sure the white skinned people of America decreased from The Left caused the election of President Trump by all of their stacked-deck Affirmative Action and black skin color based preference programs. The diversity apparatchiki wrongly conclude that an all white skinned faculty, even in the hard sciences, are debilitated by implicit white skin based bias so universities must be forced to overcome their bias by hiring a non-white skin colored physicist from a third-tier school.
That lowers the effectiveness of the university and the non-white skin colored students and the Asian raced students are the victims.
The Left misses the point that degrading standards in the name of non-white skinned Affirmative Action rules is unjust to the white skinned victims. The government created a new class of victims. Some people disagree with skin color based selections and many decided that candidate Trump just might address some of those injustices.
What makes coerced diversity so unjust is that its purpose rests on a plain-to-see but impossible to express fraud — the alleged benefits of diversity. There are none. Diversity requires choosing against merit, against competence The Left’s obsessive proclamations of this lie far more closely resemble propaganda than celebrating a cliché-like truth.
“Simply put, if diversity is so wonderful, and in the self-interest of universities and businesses, why must it be imposed forcefully? Surely if it was as beneficial as advertised, there would be no need for disparate impact lawsuits, training to overcome implicit bias and similar measures that resemble mothers punishing junior for not eating his lima beans. Does government and the social justice camp followers really believe that diversity is akin to chocolate or red wine whose consumption hardly needs coercion?” developing
Views: 23
