Mar 062019

Hijab is a symbol in Islam that is a commandment for woman be modest and to to cover their hair. It’s usually a square scarf that covers the hair, head and neck.

Some women wear hijab because they believe God instructed women to wear it as a means of fulfilling His commandment for modesty. For these women, wearing hijab is a personal choice made after puberty and is intended to reflect her personal devotion to God. In many cases, the wearing of a headscarf is often accompanied by the wearing of loose-fitting, non-revealing clothing, also referred to as hijab.

While some Muslim women do not perceive the hijab to be obligatory to their faith, other Muslim women wear the hijab as a means of visibly expressing their Muslim identity.  The hijab is synonymous with Islam and the religious intent of Islam. Some Muslim women choose to appropriate this stereotype and wear the hijab to declare and show they are different, Muslim and not Christian. Muslim women communicate their political and social alliance with their Arabic and or Muslim country of origin and to challenge and defy the West.  Wearing hijab is also to challenge Western discussions which present hijab-wearing women as oppressed or silenced. The hijab brings more attention to women and is thus contradictory to its original purpose of woman being modest and not calling attention to themselves.

The main attitude in America is that since 9/11 Islam and Muslims are antagonistic against Christians and because most Americans are Christian, against America and therefore Americans. Among Muslims the approval rating of President Trump’s performance in office is 13 percent meaning 87% do not approve of the president of the United States. That’s an amazingly high number who do not approve therefore can be considered to disapprove of the president. And among those 87% are a large number of American Muslims who are increasingly mobilizing themselves into political action.


“Muslim immigration is tied directly to Islamic terror. If there’s no Muslim immigration, you would not have Islamic terror. The more Muslim immigration, the more Islamic terror you have, and the more of the Muslim zones — these no-go zones. Europe is a cautionary tale.” 
— Pamela Geller on Priority Talk Radio, October 30, 2017

“It’s more of imposing Islam on the secular marketplace. Whether it’s in the workplace, whether it’s in the school. Islamic supremacism is what it is. You have even in Canada, the Mounties, they’re designing a police officer’s uniform with a hijab. This is Islamic supremacism. You know, Jewish law pertains only to Jews, canon law pertains only to Christians, but Sharia, Islamic law, asserts its authority over non-Muslims. This is the problem and this is something that is never discussed.” 
— Pamela Geller, Breitbart column commenting on U.S. team fencer Ibtihaj Muhammad wearing a hijab during the 2016 Olympics, February 4, 2016

“Westerners are admitting to their role in something that didn’t happen, and digging their own graves.” 
— Pamela Geller, denying the Srebrenica genocide of Bosnian Muslims, “Geller Report” August 11, 2010

“I don’t think that many westernized Muslims know when they pray five times a day that they’re cursing Christians and Jews five times a day. … I believe in the idea of a moderate Muslim. I do not believe in the idea of a moderate Islam.” 
— Pamela Geller, The New York Times, Oct. 8, 2010

“Now do I see everything through the prism of Israel? No, I don’t, but I do think it’s a very good guide. It’s a very good guide because, like I said, in the war between the civilized man and the savage, you side with the civilized man. … If you don’t lay down and die for Islamic supremacism, then you’re a racist anti-Muslim Islamophobic bigot. That’s what we’re really talking about.” 
— Pamela Geller, The New York Times, Oct. 8, 2010

“Obama is a third worlder and a coward. He will do nothing but beat up on our friends to appease his Islamic overlords.” 
— Pamela Geller,, April 13, 2010

“Hussein [meaning President Obama] is a muhammadan. He’s not insane … he wants jihad to win.” 
— Pamela Geller,, April 11, 2010

Mar 062019

This is Italian by Italians. Always been great… They Never Missed….

The Mussel’s on Wednesday is because that’s when the mussels are delivered each week so they have a special price on them. We’ve been on this for years and years. 

White or Red Sauce are equally great and your choice on the pasta. Linguine is best because it can carry the mussel’s better than angel hair but they’ll do fussilli or whatever too.

Other Specials during the week are great too. And it’s BYOB. Always red with Italian, right?

No fair filling a wine bottle with soda. . 

Mar 062019

Free Zesty sauce or any other sauce plus free extra onion, extra pickle. They call it Heavy Onion, Heavy Pickle. Extra tomato cost extra money but not extra pickle, extra onion. 

Seniors get a discount on a small soft drink and refills are free. 

BK fries are the best of the chain restaurant fries. The others are great too but the BK fries are a bit thicker. Excellant. 

This is out go-to eat out meal of the week. We eat out often, usually for dinner or lunch.. Whopper Wednesday has been on out list for years and years. 

Mar 062019

So Mutatis Mutandi the Chinese tariff’s on American Goods which are ten times what the Trumps Tariff’s are passed along to the Chinese people, in the same way as the Trump Tariff’s are passed along to American’s as per the research done by Mary Amiti, Stephen J. Redding, and David Weinstein, the three researchers  for the Centre for Economic Policy Research, a London-based think tank, by thr trio of economists from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Princeton University, and Columbia University who somehow simply forgot or overlooked the full equation.

And the folks over at REASON where they ran this rather stupid half-analysis  have lost their reasoning abilities in favor of their Bash-The-President prejudices.

This proves the fake conclusions of the three academics who conducted what they called a “grievance studies” experiment. They wrote fake papers on ridiculous subjects and submitted them to prominent academic journals in fields that study gender, race, and sexuality.

They did this to “expose a political corruption that has taken hold of the universities,” say the hoaxers in a video which documented the process.

John Stossel interviewed James Lindsay and Peter Boghossian who, along with Helen Pluckrose, sent so-called research papers to 20 journals.

They were surprised when seven papers were accepted. One claimed that “dog humping incidents at dog parks” can be taken as “evidence of rape culture.” It was honored as “excellent scholarship.” See??