Biden’s DOJ Head of Civil Rights Believes Melanin Endows Blacks Like Her With Super Powers
That’s just plain crazy.
Kristin Clarke is Joe Biden’s appointee as DOJ head of Civil Rights Division. But, while a president of the Black Student Association at Harvard in 1994, she wrote in the Harvard Crimson newspaper that black people have “greater mental, physical and spiritual abilities.” Yeah, .. Like Greta Thunberg’s identical claim about her own super powers. Myth, hogwash and crazy rubbish. If it was true far fewer black people would be in jail because of their criminal physical actions. Blacks were disproportionately likely to commit homicide and to be the victims. In 2008 the offending rate for blacks was seven times higher than for whites and the victimization rate was six times higher.
Kristin Clarke is President Biden’s nominee to be assistant attorney general for the civil rights division. She has promoted racist pseudo-scientific quackery, arguing that the human brain was structured in a way that makes black people superior to white people, and that “human mental processes” in the brain have chemicals that imbue one race with “superior physical and mental abilities” and “spiritual abilities.”.
In order to back up her claims, she cited ideas from psychiatrist Richard King who authored the book Melanin: A Key To Freedom and said that “locus coeruleus structure in the human brain “is Black because it contains large amounts of (neuro) melanin which is essential for its operation” while asserting that melanin is “chemical basis for the cultural differences between blacks and whites.” She also believes that “whites are unable to produce melanin because their pineal glands are often calcification or non-functioning…Pineal calcification rates with Africans are five to 15 percent, Asians 15 to 25 percent and Europeans 60 to 80 percent.”
She also invited an anti-Semite to the Harvard campus.
She added that “Black infants sit, stand, crawl, and walk sooner than whites” and that “melanin endows Blacks with greater mental, physical and spiritual abilities — something which cannot be measured based on Eurocentric standards.” She conveniently avoided explaining those attributes quickly disappear and blacks soon fall behind the other races although they may have superior athletic abilities when young.
She accused “conservative whites” of exacerbating the impact of racism on black children, while “liberal whites” underestimate it. She added that it appeared that “whites have grown tired of hearing about racism” so they accepted the notions described in “The Bell Curve.” Note: The Bell Curve used exact, precise and true information to reach the conclusions in the book. Blacks have IQ’s significantly lower than whites.
She also penned an op-ed in January clearly calling for the “strategic” defunding of police and then lied on Wednesday, saying “I do not support defunding the police,” suggesting her precise and clear words were somehow taken out of context.
Here are the words. See if you think there is anything to misunderstand.
“We must invest less in police and more in social workers. …
We must invest less in police and more in social supports in our schools. …
We must invest less in police and more in mental health aid.”
She may not want to abolish all police like Rashida Tlaib or kill all cops like BLM, but she certainly does want to defund them to a large extent.
Republicans also criticized Clarke over the editorial she wrote at Harvard University in 1994 that sought to rebut claims made in “The Bell Curve” that tied intelligence to race. In the piece, Clarke recited research by some black scholars that suggested blacks are intellectually superior, a point she reiterated Wednesday was intended to be “satirical.” That’s rubbish. Here’s more proof about her white-hot white hate……
Tucker Carlson revealed that while Kristin Clarke was president of Harvard University’s Black Students Association, she compared Black vs. White genetics in an article she wrote for the student newspaper, The Harvard Crimson.
On Carlson’s show, he references a published article from The Harvard Crimson in 1994 that Clarke co-authored with fellow student Victoria Kennedy.
In the article, titled Blacks Seek an End to Abuse, Clarke and Kennedy introduced their piece by writing that it is “in response to those who defend The Bell Curve.”
The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life is a highly written reference work by Richard J. Herrnstein and Charles Murray mentioned on Amazon as “the controversial book linking intelligence to class and race in modern society, and what public policy can do to mitigate socioeconomic differences in IQ, birth rate, crime, fertility, welfare, and poverty.” The controversy over “The Bell Curve” is the agreement or disagreement about it’s statistically supported and proven data on intelligence by race.
Carlson pulls out quotations from the beginning of Clarke and Kennedy’s article, reading them to his Fox News audience that state:
“Please use the following theories and observations to assist you in your search for truth regarding the genetic differences between blacks and whites.
“One: Dr. Richard King reveals that at the core of the human brain is the “locus coeruleus” which is a structure that is black because it contains large amounts of neuro-melanin which is essential for its operation.
“Two: Black infants sit, stand, crawl and walk sooner than whites.
“Three: Carol Barnes notes that human mental processes are controlled by melanin—that same chemical which gives blacks their superior physical and mental abilities.
It was meant to express an equally absurd point of view—fighting one ridiculous absurd racist theory with another ridiculous absurd theory.
“Four: Some scientists have revealed that most whites are unable to produce melanin because their pineal glands are often calcified or non-functioning. Pineal calcification rates with Africans are five to 15 percent, Asians 15 to 25 percent and Europeans 60 to 80 percent. This is the chemical basis for the cultural differences between Blacks and whites.
“Five: Melanin endows Blacks with greater mental, physical and spiritual abilities—something which cannot be measured based on Eurocentric standards.”
Carlson does not reference the rest of the article, which claims that the The Bell Curve is an “attack on Black people.”
Shortly after the article was published, Clarke clarified the intentions of the article to Elie Kaunfer, a student leader for the Harvard-Radcliffe Hillel, Harvard’s campus center for Jewish life, who published Clarke’s explanation in another article for The Crimson in 1994.
“I was confused and concerned about the content of Clarke’s letter, which mentioned various theories claiming Blacks are genetically superior to whites. But I took the time to talk to Clarke and realized that she did not share those views,” Kaufner wrote.
“The point of Clarke’s letter, as explained to me, seemed to be that racist opinions of white Harvard ‘scholars’ are publicly debated while racist opinions of Black ‘scholars’ are categorically rejected. I wish Clarke had made this reasoning clear to The Crimson from the start.”
Clarke addressed recent criticism following Carlson’s show in an interview with The Forward on Wednesday night when she again said that her article Blacks Seek an End to Abuse was a direct response to The Bell Curve.
The Forward reported Clarke saying that The Bell Curve “was generating wide acclaim for its racist views,” so she introduced her article “with an absurd claim that Black people are superior based on the melanin in their skin” in order to “hold up a mirror to reflect how reprehensible the premise of Black inferiority was set.”
“It was meant to express an equally absurd point of view—fighting one ridiculous absurd racist theory with another ridiculous absurd theory,” Clarke told The Forward.
Although she did not address Carlson’s criticisms directly, she claimed in her interview that conservative outlets are “putting out a lot of false and twisted information.”
The Ruling is:
Despite Clarke’s recent assertions that her 1994 co-authored article for The Harvard Crimson was meant to “express an equally absurd point of view,” it is not stated in the article that her and Kennedy’s claims on black vs. white genetics were not serious at the time.
Ultimately, she did write about black vs. white genetics, although she said it was written in response to The Bell Curve.
The verdict about Criminals:
There is evidence in the official police-recorded figures that black Americans are more likely to commit certain types of crime than people of other races.
Kristin Clarke does not merit or deserve any high office at all let alone the one president Biden appointed her to. She needs to remove the fake “e” from the end of her name and remove herself from consideration for any office of the United States. She is disqualified because she is a race-driven individual. Such people do not belong in any part of the government of America.