Obama has destroyed individual rights on a greater scale than many historic dictators. Hugo Chavez, Fidel Castro, Amadenijad, Saddam Hussein didn’t go as far as Obama because they started in countries with no tradition of Rights like America before Obama got started.

Lets start with a definition of “Rights”. One of the most fierce champions of the concept of Rights is Ayn Rand who wrote:

“A “right” is a moral principle defining and sanctioning a man’s freedom of action in a social context. There is only one fundamental right (all the others are its consequences or corollaries): a man’s right to his own life. Life is a process of self-sustaining and self-generated action; the right to life means the right to engage in self-sustaining and self-generated action—which means: the freedom to take all the actions required by the nature of a rational being for the support, the furtherance, the fulfillment and the enjoyment of his own life. (Such is the meaning of the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.)

The concept of a “right” pertains only to action—specifically, to freedom of action. It means freedom from physical compulsion, coercion or interference by other men.

Thus, for every individual, a right is the moral sanction of a positive—of his freedom to act on his own judgment, for his own goals, by his own voluntary, uncoerced choice. As to his neighbors, his rights impose no obligations on them except of a negative kind: to abstain from violating his rights.

The right to life is the source of all rights—and the right to property is their only implementation. Without property rights, no other rights are possible. Since man has to sustain his life by his own effort, the man who has no right to the product of his effort has no means to sustain his life. The man who produces while others dispose of his product, is a slave.

Bear in mind that the right to property is a right to action, like all the others: it is not the right to an object, but to the action and the consequences of producing or earning that object. It is not a guarantee that a man will earn any property, but only a guarantee that he will own it if he earns it. It is the right to gain, to keep, to use and to dispose of material values.”

When Obama passed Obamacare he knowingly took money from every America to finance his scheme. The Supreme Court ruled it was unconstitutional because it violated the Constitution except that it was a tax. Look what happens when people have their money taken from them by coercion meaning they have no choice about paying because they will be punished if they refuse to pay. So the first violation of Obama is the taking of money on a massive scale, far higher than petty dictators like Chavez, Castro and Amadenijad. Theft is immoral. It deprives a person of the ability to take the actions to sustain their life as they choose. You cannot live your life according to your right to live it when your money is taken from you. How basic is that? By taking your money and giving it to someone else Obama violates your right to your life and to the happiness your money would provide. Then Obama gives your money to health care workers who give their services to people who have no right to your money. How destructive of so many rights? Obama knows that. He knows it’s morally wrong to steal but not only does he steal he lures other people to his pool of stolen money and forces them to take money that isn’t theirs. Immoral action on a scale like that is unprecedented in the history of the world. He disgraced the human race.

Hits: 2