The Electoral College was designed to prevent a demigod from being elected. It didn’t work in some Philly neighborhoods where Obama received up to 99% of the vote which proved elections are the result of many factors. No one claims free elections must be objective.
From the Inquirer:
Vote was astronomical for Obama in some Philadelphia wards
Shakiena Williams with daughter Jahira in the 44th Ward:
Some Philadelphia neighborhoods outdid themselves in Tuesday’s presidential election. In a city where President Obama received more than 85 percent of the votes, in some places he received almost every one. In 13 Philadelphia wards, Obama received 99 percent of the vote or more.
Those wards, many with large African American populations, also swung heavily for Obama over John McCain in 2008. But the difficult economy seemed destined to dampen that enthusiasm four years later.
Not to worry. Ward leaders and voters said they were just as motivated this time.
“In this election, you had to point out to the people what was at stake. And in many cases, they felt that the Romney doctrine was not going to favor the working man,” said Edgar “Sonny” Campbell.
Campbell is leader of West Philadelphia’s Fourth Ward, where Obama received 9,955 votes. Romney? Just 55. That’s five fewer than McCain in 2008.Campbell acknowledged that the odds are stacked in his favor in Philadelphia, where Democrats outnumber GOP voters by nearly 7-1.“You are looking at black neighborhoods where you have 1,000 voters in a division and maybe seven Republicans,” he said. “We are shocked if Romney got any votes.”Even so, Randall Miller, a history professor at St. Joseph’s University, said politicians almost never get 99 percent of the votes anywhere except, perhaps, the towns where they were born.He said the Democratic voter turnout effort deserved credit for the president’s success.“Ninety-nine percent is extraordinary, and it shows discipline as much as anything else,” he said.