Loretta Lynch removed the references of radical Islamic beliefs from the 911 transcripts of calls the Orlando terrorist made to the police during his massacre, Attorney General Loretta Lynch said Sunday, June 26.
A heavily censored partial transcript of the conversations between authorities and the terrorist who killed 49 and wounded 53 in the June 12 attack at a Florida gay nightclub, was released on Monday June 27.
Lynch appeared on numerous Sunday talk shows and said the transcripts will not include the terrorists oath of loyalty to ISIS or any other religious justification for the attack.
“What we’re not going to do is further proclaim this man’s pledges of allegiance to terrorist groups, and further his propaganda,” Lynch told NBC. “We are not going to hear him make his assertions of allegiance [to the Islamic State].” that’s the order from President Obama who is close to Islam, Muslims, Mosques and Muslim countries and culture. In short he favors Muslims and protects them. While doing that he deceives American’s to believe he puts American’s first. Nothing could be further from the truth.
The 911 calls confirm the terrorists motives in the wake of Facebook postings from the killer that already reveal Islamist beliefs.
Lynch said they are removing the pledges to ISIS to avoid “revictimizing those who went through this horror.” Oh, come on. The only people horrified by the mere mention of ISIS are in the White House.
Lynch’s conduct and Obama’s conduct are clear violations of the written Federal Ethical Standards which read in relevant part: “You may not use your public office ………for the gain of ….. organizations with which you are associated personally.” “Your position or title shall not be used: to coerce or induce another person, including a subordinate, to provide any benefit, …… to you or ……… persons with whom you are affiliated in a nongovernmental capacity;”
That comes from the Code Of Federal Regulations: 5 CFR 2635.702. President Obama knowingly and willfully violated that section of the CFR numerous times, one of which is his decision to purposely withhold from the public the telephone records of the 911 calls during the murders of the Orlando terrorist/murderer to the police.
What are the penalties for violations of the CFR Code of Ethical Conduct? “any above-noted prohibited conduct, and more, may be grounds for suspension or revocation of a clearance. This could also result in adverse disciplinary action, including suspension or removal.”
Removal of the President from office? Yes, that’s one of the penalties for lying to the people. Obama’s lies are much more serious than a lie told by one person to another. His lies affect the reputation of the United States.
Obama was criticized by reviewers of his tactics who blasted Obama and Lynch who censored the transcripts that branded the terrorist acts as motivated by radical Islam. Obama and Lynch attempted to wrongly blame the Orlando attack on the guns, not the motives of the Terrorist. That’s also fraud. Fraud is a crime.
In his anti-Trump tirade, President Obama said, “There’s no magic to the phrase, ‘radical Islam.’ It’s a political talking point; it’s not a strategy.”
Which is a really weird thing to say about a phrase that he avoids as if it were a magical incantation. Being afraid to speak truthfully about radical Islam is ascribing a certain magic to words!
Obama is in denial about Islamist terror. He’s ill-equipped to handle Islamic based security threats.
This is just the latest effort by the Obama administration to downplay ISIS terrorism and radical Islamist terrorism in general. President Obama also, angrily, claimed that correctly identifying radical Islamist terror as radical Islamist terror was silly and wouldn’t improve the Obama administration’s strategy for combating the threat it poses.
Obama actually said: “What exactly would using this label accomplish? What exactly would it change? Would it make ISIL less committed to trying to kill Americans? Would it bring in more allies? Is there a military strategy that is served by this? The answer is, none of the above. Calling a threat by a different name does not make it go away. This is a political distraction.”
The president added: “There’s no magic to the phrase, ‘radical Islam.’ It’s a political talking point; it’s not a strategy.”
Everyone, especially Americans just witnessed the second successful ISIS attack on American soil and the response of the White House is to pooh-pooh ISIS involvement; to change the conversation — again! — into Second Amendment limitations, and to suggest that it’s not as big a deal as people are making it out to be.
Whatever Obama’s actual strategy to counter terror is–and we don’t know if he has one — it sounds like his idea is to tell people: “Calm down about ISIS.” But telling people to calm down about something is never a good idea. Telling people to calm down when they have 49 very legitimate reasons not to is dumb.
Dealing with the reality of Islamist terrorist organizations by acknowledging their reality and the role they play is not a full strategy for combating them, although it is good groundwork for same. But the Obama administration is in denial about Islam and is doing a horrible job demonstrating that denialism is an even remotely acceptable strategy. In fact it’s insane.