Like the ostrich hides from danger by burying it’s head, Liberals eliminate problems by burying the word. Problem Solved.
Men too powerful? Liberals ban the word “Man” and replace it with “People”. Replace “Boy” with “Child”; Boys with “Children”.
How simple for Liberals to change the world by simply changing the language and eliminating the words for things they don’t like.
So why do Liberals tolerate guns? They don’t. They have banned the word “Gun” from all children’s books; from all school rooms and from all school property. That didn’t stop Americans from getting and keeping guns but it helped get millions of children brainwashed into hating guns and hating America because it allowed guns. President Obama never owned a gun.
Should the Liberals should ban the word “Barack”? He did for the first part of his life. He called himself: “Barry”. He thought it was ingratiating him to white people so he changed “Barry” to “Barack” for racial and political purposes. But the Liberals will never will ban “Barack” because he fits their anti-America attitude. After all, he’s not an American. He’s a Kenyan because his father was born in Kenya but learned to hate America at Harvard. Read Barack’s books.
No, Obama wasn’t born in Kenya but his father was. That made the future President a British subject at birth.
Obama went to Kenya and cried at the graves of his Kenyan father and his Kenyan grandfather. He never went to the hometown of his mother in Kansas. According to the laws of Great Britain the sons and daughters of British Citizens are also British citizens. Obama could claim and he would get a British Passport because his father was British.
Of course Obama would never want to be British. He doesn’t seem to want to be American too awfully much either. He seems happiest being a son of Africa. He wrote his first book “Dreams From My Father”, not from his mother who abandoned him to live in Indonesia.
The president told the world: Quote in context here, “The United States continues to wrestle with the legacy of race, slavery and segregation,” That’s a flat out lie and the President either knows it and wants to continue to lie about it or he doesn’t know it so he’s talking about something about which he knows nothing. Either way, he’s a problem.
“Race” is not a problem in America. It’s a crime to be a racist. It’s called a “Hate Crime”. According to Wiki: “Hate crime” generally refers to criminal acts that are seen to have been motivated by bias against one or more of the types below, or of their derivatives. Incidents may involve physical assault, damage to property, bullying, harassment, verbal abuse or insults, or offensive graffiti or letters (hate mail). Hate mail is mail for which the Constitution doesn’t protect the writer.
Examples of such groups include but are not limited to: ethnicity, (that’s race), gender identity, language, nationality, physical appearance, religion, or sexual orientation. The President is a law professor from Harvard. He is responsible to know the law. So when he says things that are wrong according to the law, he’s lying.
When Obama says the United States continues to wrestle with the legacy of slavery he’s really on the wrong side of the truth. President Lincoln fought a war against slavery. That war ended in 1861 with the surrender at Yorktown. The 13th Amendment became law in 1865. The President certainly knows about the 13th Amendment so when he says that despite a law passed in 1865 the U.S. still has problems with slavery he’s on the wrong side of the truth there too.
The President believes America is segregated but all he needs to do is look at T.V. to realize there’s no segregation at all in the commercials and the casts which go overboard to employ black people. Does that mean they employ fewer white people? Not unless they employ more people than they need for a commercial.
Same for the News and the Movies. Overboard means far more integration than the President knows about. For the third time, he’s on the wrong side of the truth. That’s three lies. He’s just pandering to the race of his father, which is not the same as his.
The President is not black. It’s not that he’s not black enough, whatever that means. It means he’s just not a black man. He’s bi-racial. he should be poly-racial since he’s the leader of a polyracial nation.
He’s not a white man either. He’s both. Instead of taking sides, which he’s always done as President, he should have tried to get the races more together. He admits he believes the U.S. is segregated. He said it. He’s wrong but since he said it, why doesn’t he do something to get rid of the race hustlers like Al Sharpton who is a race consultant for him and de-segregate his administration. Michelle can help. She has more servants than Queen Elizabeth. She could help show how well she’s adapted to the integrated culture in America.
Yeah, fat chance.
Obama was described by polymath Steven Sailer as “America’s Half-Blood Prince” but he’s not ruling that way. He’s not America’s first Black President either but no matter how much he refuses to use the word “White” to describe half of his ancestry, he’s as much white as he is black, at least according to his biology.
There’s a lot in the foregoing to ban so the PC crowd can get busy but what they can’t ban is biology.