Diversity is the code word for keeping people separated by race, culture, gender or nationality. It’s fallacious thinking.

Diversity is not a strength. If the idea that diversity is a strength was true then it’s against the strength that made America exceptional and great. Diversity was started to help with the destruction of America.

By removing the bedrock basis of the assimilation of all cultures, creeds, races into America, Americanism and Americans America is under siege.

The recent Supreme court decision  striking down affirmative action was rendered in a 6 to 2 majority decision opposed by Justice Sotomayor. The case was Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action.  

Consider that no country supports the idea that there’s something good about diversity. Anti-Diversity is supported by every country on the planet. That’s what a border is. Borders are proof that anti-diversity not only exists, it’s supported and the proof of anti-diversity is every country discriminates in favor of it’s citizens. A passport does that too. It shows an individual is only a member of one country.

Simple math will show that a chain is only as strong as it’s weakest link yet the idea of diversity promotes adding any link regardless of it’s weakness. Diversity can only make a cohesive group of people more difficult to worse.The idea that Diversity is good ignors the evidence that it’s not. America was set up to overcome Diversity and replace it with Assimilation. the Melting Pot idea was to avoid the problems of different races, cultures and nations by making America the place where all diversity is eliminated.

A bleak picture of the corrosive effects of ethnic diversity has been revealed in research by noted Harvard University’s Professor Robert Putnam, one of the worlds most influential political scientists.(Here)

His research shows that the more diverse a community is, the less likely it’s inhabitants are to trust anyone – from their next door neighbor to the mayor.

Quoting from the Financial Times report:

“The effect of Diversity is worse than had been imagined And it’s not just that we don’t trust people who are not like us. In fact in Diverse Communities we don’t trust people who are like us.

Prof Putnam found trust was lowest in Los Angeles, “the most diverse human habitation in human history”, but his findings also held for rural South Dakota, where “diversity means inviting Swedes to a Norwegians’ picnic”.

When the data were adjusted for class, income and other factors, they showed that the more people of different races lived in the same community, the greater the loss of trust. “They don’t trust the local mayor, they don’t trust the local paper, they don’t trust other people and they don’t trust institutions,” said Prof Putnam. “The only thing there’s more of is protest marches and TV watching.”

America succeeded because past generations wanted a life safe from the prejudices of every other culture, race and nation. Assimilation is another word for almagmation, a blending together of different things. Diversity means keeping races, cultures and nations separate, a sort of apartheid type of America where preferences for minorities are called affirmative action. Code for revenge but revenge will not bring a nations together. Neither will Affirmative Action.

 

The Affirmative Action Culture is a new a new idea that places diversity, -our differences, ahead of that which we have in common, that which once united us all. It says we must celebrate only that which is different about each of us. That we must hold on to what separates us and run from anything that might bring us together.

 

That’s a horrible idea but its been the direction the Progressives and the Left have taken America over the past 50 years, to our detriment.

 

The American idea of Individual Rights means government must protect the rights and the freedom’s of each individual. Diversity changes the basis of the calculation away from protecting rights to protecting only certain minorities. It’s easier for government to protect and provide advantages for several minorities instead of protecting both minorities and majorities.

 

Government is not supposed to provide benefits based on race, culture, gender or nationality. that’s what Affirmative action does. Justice Sotomayor  knows that and admits she was helped by affirmative action. What she refuses to admit is some more deserving person was deprived in the same amount that she benefitted. The injustice escapes Sotomayor who wants to continue the injustice. She should be ashamed to admit her story because of the injustices caused by her nationality. .

Hits: 13