MORE BACKLASH AGAINST PC !

Thanks to some really dumb actions by two exec’s at A&E and a GLADD spokesperson Americans can at last respond, if only in a small way, to the Politically Correct Movement. Remember Alec Baldwin’s remarks? He was booted off his MSNBC show. How about Charlie Sheen saying to the crowd at the opening of a new bar in Mexico, “How we doing? Lying bunch of faggot assholes, how we doing?” (Here).

Rush Limbaugh said: “He ends up getting fired and GLAAD starts running around talking about, ‘We’re not gonna put up with this kind of discrimination.’ Well, then, you better start demanding he be rehired because he’s the only guy who’s been discriminated against.”

Remember the Chick-fil-A backlash? Around July of 2012 the president of CFA dared to express an opinion that some found to be offensive on whether gay people should marry one another.  CFA actually hires gay people and apparently does not discriminate against gays or anyone else in its hiring practices or customer service. The Gay community was outraged. Mike Huckabee, Sarah Palin and even Nancy Pelosi stood with Chick Fil A on CFA Appreciation day “

Regarding support for the Duck, Dennis Prager on his syndicated radio show said his firing was symptomatic of a larger problem. “It is clear that only one side is not allowed to speak,” Prager said. “You can say anything from the left.” Leftists have achieved a degree of censorship of public discourse they could never have dreamt of had they openly stated that their intention was to radically transform Western civilization and destroy its foundations.

Multiculturalism and Political Correctness are camouflage for Socialism, itself a counterfeit word for Cultural Marxism which in turn is the disguise for Communism and Marxism. The objective. purpose and passion for Multiculti and PC is pitting various ethnic and cultural groups against each other to attack the pluralistic basis of American culture  in order to destroy the coherence of Western society from within. It’s been working well, unfortunately.

Political Correctness: A Short History of an Ideology, edited by William S. Lind. According to Lind, Political Correctness “wants to change behavior, thought, even the words we use. To a significant extent, it already has.” “Whoever or whatever controls language also controls thought.”
“Political Correctness” is in fact Cultural Marxism.

The totalitarian nature of Political Correctness can be seen on[University] campuses where ‘PC’ has taken over the college: freedom of speech, of the press, and even of thought are all eliminated.

In the cultural Marxism of Political Correctness certain groups are good,” for instance feminist women. Similarly, “white males are  determined automatically to be evil, thereby becoming the equivalent of the bourgeoisie in economic Marxism or the witches in Salem.

Raymond V. Raehn agrees with Lind that “Political Correctness is Marxism, with all that implies: loss of freedom of expression, thought control, inversion of the traditional social order and, ultimately, a totalitarian state.” According to him, “Gramsci envisioned a long march through the society’s institutions, including the government, the judiciary, the military,  the schools and the media.” “He also concluded that so long as the workers had
a Christian soul, they would not respond to revolutionary appeals.” Another one  of the early cultural Marxists, Georg Lukacs, noted that “Such a worldwide  overturning of values cannot take place without the annihilation of the old  values and the creation of new ones by the revolutionaries.” At a meeting in  Germany in 1923, “Lukacs proposed the concept of inducing “Cultural Pessimism” in order to increase the state of hopelessness and alienation in the people of the West as a necessary prerequisite for revolution.” “Law professor Catharine MacKinnon writes in Toward a Feminist Theory of the State (1989), “The rule of law and the rule of men are one thing, indivisible, because “State power, embodied in law, exists throughout society as male power.” Furthermore, “Male power is systemic. Coercive, legitimated, and epistemic, it is the regime.”  MacKinnon has argued that sexual harassment is essentially an issue of power exercised by the dominant over the subordinate group.” At an academic conference sponsored by the University of Nebraska, “the
attendees articulated the view that ‘White students desperately need formal “training” in racial and cultural awareness. The moral goal of such training should override white notions of privacy and individualism.’”

This can and does sometimes amount to virtual brainwashing disguised as critical thinking. Fonte mentions that at Columbia University, “new students are encouraged to get rid of ‘their own social and personal beliefs that foster inequality.’ To accomplish this, the assistant dean for freshmen, Katherine Balmer, insists that ‘training’ is needed. At the end of freshmen orientation at Bryn Mawr in the early 1990s, according to the school program, students were ‘breaking free’ of ‘the cycle of oppression’ and becoming ‘change agents.’ Syracuse University’s multicultural program is designed to teach students that they live ‘in a world impacted by various oppression issues, including racism.’” The dice thereby are loaded against America, American values as well as white people who it is claimed have privileges which should be outlawed because they make non-white feel discriminated against.

The current flap against Duck Dynasty is a good example of the Marxist style of Divide and Conquer in action. It’s also evidence of the purposeful de-construction of the basis of American culture. It’s gays against the American mainstream, a mainstream which wrongly has been shattered into the various ethnic sexual and religious pieces.

“At an academic conference sponsored by the University of Nebraska, “the  attendees  articulated the view that ‘White students desperately need formal “training” in racial and cultural awareness. The moral goal of such training should override white notions of privacy and individualism.’”

Being called “Anti-Gay” is also the modern equivalent of being branded a sinner in puritanical New England where the so called righteous Puritans even banished Preacher Roger Williams so PC bullying has a long pedigree. Unfortunately calling people names works as it’s worked so far for GLADD but watch the progress of the backlash. It will show the shallowness of the PC movement.     

Views: 27