May 012017
 

Capitalism requires individual Liberty. Socialism requires a government to operate it which must pick winners and losers so it results in oppression, poverty and special privleges for party elites.
At present America is Capitalism with a Welfare State. Free markets generated so much wealth that the government could impose welfare programs without upsetting the free markets too much but it was the stored up wealth that was and is used to impose the welfare system onto a free market couture. Without the wealth from traders to pay for the welfare state the welfare state couldn’t exist.


WHAT ABOUT CUBA?
Cuba has very high literacy rates, …but they imprison librarians and other people who have copies of banned books. Capitalistic America would never stand for that.
Cuba has free medical care but expensive major operations aren’t allowed.

May 012017
 

The United Nations has become a sick joke. It’s time to end the charade on the East River. the United Nations is the most fevered enemy of America and Israel. It needs to be closed.


a letter to the U.N, signed by all 100 U.S. senators in rare unanimity stops short of calling for the global body’s ejection from American shores. We go that extra step. Close the entire building and send the phony America Hating members back to their cesspool countries.

The lettter from 100 Senators insists the U.N.’s behavior toward Israel must change.

“Too often, the U.N. is exploited as a vehicle for targeting Israel rather than as a forum committed to advancing the lofty goals of its founders,” the letter states. “These actions have at times reinforced the broader scourge of anti-Semitism, and distracted certain U.N. entities from their original missions.

“As both the U.N.’s principal founding member and its largest contributor, the United States should insist on reform. As duly elected representatives of the American people, we take seriously our responsibility to conduct rigorous oversight of U.S. engagement at the United nations. We are deeply committed to international leadership and to advancing respect for human rights.

“But continued targeting of Israel by the U.N. Human Rights Council and other U.N. entities is unacceptable. This situation must change.

“We urge you to engage member states in a comprehensive effort to directly confront and root out this bias.”

The letter, directed to Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, followed a statement from U.S. Ambassador Nikki Haley declaring, “It is the U.N.’s anti-Israel bias that is long overdue for change.”

The letter cited the U.N.’s “standing committees,” which sometimes “serve no purpose other than to attack Israel and inspire the anti-Israel boycott.”

They must be eliminated or reformed, the senators said.

Then there’s UNESCO, which denies “Jewish and Christian connections to Jerusalem.”

The senators also criticized the U.N. Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees, which perpetuates “troubling anti-Israel bias and activities.”

“Most troubling is the United Nations Human Rights Council. Charged with shining a light on gross human rights violations, the UNHRC – whose membership currently includes some of the world’s worst human rights violator – instead devotes time to unwarranted attacks against Israel.”

The letter explained, “The UNHRC even maintains a permanent time on its agenda ‘ ‘Agenda Item VII’ – to assess Israel even as numerous other countries, including some represented on the council, commit egregious human rights abuses.”

The U.S. pays about $3 billion a year to the general fund and more to specific U.N. projects.

It’s more than what 185 other countries pay combined.

The petition states, the U.N. “is a clear and present danger to the sovereignty and survival of the United States of America and its close ally, the Jewish state of Israel, despite being all but entirely dependent on American aid.”

The United Nations has voted more times to condemn Israel than all the other nations of the world combined. It also adopts procedures and policies to override national law and advocate for abortion. It routinely appoints nations with poor records on human rights, such as Angola and Senegal, to its Security Council. And it threatens Americans’ constitutional rights through its Arms Trade Treaty and even parental rights through its Convention on the Rights of the Child.

The letter was authored by Sens. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., and Christopher A. Coons, D-Del.

The senators said they are “united in their desire to see the United Nations improve its treatment of Israel and to eliminate anti-Semitism in all its forms.”

“We are deeply committed to international leadership and to advancing respect for human rights. But continued targeting of Israel by the U.N. Human Rights Council and other U.N. entities is unacceptable.”

The bipartisan demand letter comes in time for the vote on the anti-Israel UNESCO resolution on Tuesday, which also coincides with Israel’s Independence Day. The clearly anti-Semitic motion – drafted by Arab states on behalf of the Palestinians – targets the Jewish state’s sovereignty over its capital city and denies any Jewish connection to key holy sites in Bethlehem and Hebron.

Part of the proposed U.N. resolution reads: “Any action taken by Israel, the Occupying Power, to impose its laws, jurisdiction, and administration on the City of Jerusalem are illegal and therefore null and void and have no validity whatsoever.”

A separate petition issued by WND urging the U.S. to cut off funds to the U.N states: “It is outrageous an organization hosted on American soil, protected by American arms, funded by American tax dollars and built upon a global order sustained by the United States seemingly spends all its time attacking America and its ally Israel. It an insult to global decency that Israel, the only democracy in the Middle East, is continuously targeted with the most outrageous slander and vitriolic attack as the United Nations allows some of the worst tyrannies on the planet to sit in judgment. Finally, as an independent republic, the United States of America has a responsibility to itself and to the world to cease subsidizing an institution which has not only proven hostile to the sovereignty of the United States and the security of Israel, but which has also shown itself to be a breeding ground of anti-Semitism and support for Islamic extremism.”

May 012017
 

Galileo was arrested, prosecuted and punished by The Catholic Church and their error is still not admitted. Galileo was correct in 1616 when he wrote that the earth moved around the sun but Cardinal Ratzinger who became Pope Benedict the 16th wrote in 1990 that the church was correct to punish Galileo. As Pope he was invited to speak at the largest university in Italy but a group exposed his opposition to Galileo and demanded he stay away. He did. Score one for reason. 

What about the truth? Why was and why is the church opposed to it? Because a known universe upsets the basis for their schemes.

The credibility of any institution depends on the accuracy of it’s individual decisions. Neither a Pope nor the church is immune from the truth. The truth is the church was as wrong in 1633 when they denied the truth of Galileo’s science as Cardinal Ratzinger was in 1990 and as he remained wrong in 2008. That’s 401 years That’s not the record for the longest lie ever told which goes back so far into time that the starting date for the errors attributed to mistaken misbelief’s about the universe remains unknown. It’s what gave rise to medicine men, witch doctors, wizards and other heavenly prognosticators who gained power from the myths. Those dangers are still with us only today they are called Liberals.
Liberals would side with the mystical as they have been doing in their opposition to President Trump.   

May 012017
 

Blogger: “I have more examples of Chelsea’s general insufferability. How about the fact that she used the pseudonym “Diane Reynolds” while 1.) Corresponding with her mother and 2.) Raising money for the totally-not-corrupt Clinton Foundation? Or how about how she lied for her mother (or played dumb, at least)? Or how about how she has regularly danced around actually addressing the real conflicts of interest concerns surrounding the Clinton Foundation? Or how about how she constantly attempts to paint herself as a child political prodigy? Who could forget her story about the pro-choice revelation she had at the young age of six.

“I was raised in a Methodist church and I left the Baptist church before my dad did, because I didn’t know why they were talking to me about abortion when I was 6 in Sunday school — that’s a true story.”

Six-year-old Chelsea– a political genius in the making. Seriously. Why else would she tell us that? And if that’s not enough to prove how unlikable she is, perhaps this will convince you. People who have worked under her say she’s highly unpleasant. She’s not a likable person in real life. In fact, she actually caused “high turnover” at the Clinton Foundation.

But none of that matters to her adoring fanbase. Chelsea scores points for merely existing.

She’s uninspiring and dull. She gets awards for “volunteering” for HER OWN ORGANIZATION. She’s the human participation trophy. That’s why I can’t stand Chelsea Clinton.


Does everyone view Chelsea as a bitchy, unlikable braggart? From Chicks On The Right: She didn’t do anything to get to where she is today. She only has a platform because she has the right last name– the last name that magically absolves one of all guilt. The last name that forces everyone to put on bizarre political blinders. The last name that calls for unadulterated worship. Chelsea doesn’t know the first thing about working her way up to become something. Everything has been handed to her on a silver platter. I’m supposed to find inspiration in that? She never got her hands dirty. She never opened a business. She never employed anyone. I could go on.

Chelsea constantly attempts to weigh on political issues on Twitter– whether it be jobs, the economy, the climate, women’s rights or free speech. Am I really supposed to be inspired by someone who never truly had skin in the game and who has no special insight on those topics? What makes her opinion more relevant than mine?

She never had to freak out over paying bills or finding a job. She never had to worry about one of her businesses failing, and I’m sure as heck sure she never had a problem accessing her “rights as a female”– aka birth control. Seriously. Why does Chelsea’s opinion have more weight than everyone else’s? Am I really supposed to take her seriously when she says stuff like, “I was curious if I could care about (money) on some fundamental level, and I couldn’t“?

She had a $3 million wedding (thanks Clinton Foundation!). She lives in a multi-million dollar apartment. This isn’t about her being rich. It’s about her pretending to be like us, and people like us actually looking up to her, as if she’s an inspiring figure.

May 012017
 

It looked like a dinner for thousands of “The Official Washington Enemies Of President Trump” who turned out to show their United-In-Hate Of The President Of The United States. They actually gathered to condemn the President Of The United States thinking the American people who voted for President Trump are so stupid that they would support this well-dressed rich rabble.

No American flag pins were displayed. None. No NRA lapel buttons either but scads of America hating journalists met with their demented kindred spirits.


Not since Senator Joseph McCarthy were so many fangirls and fanboys of Karl Marx and the USSR gathered together in one overflowing roomful of Lefties. These are the descendents of the Inquisitions courtrooms.


The “Master of Ceremonies” was a Muslim 9/11 sympathizer Hasan Minhaj, chosen because he was a Left wing Liberal twofer. Muslim, of course, Christianity is the enemy to these people. His skin color, “Not White” which has some kind of hidden message for America, the most tolerant of extremely different people, races and religions, who was enthusiastically supported by 99.9% of those in attendance. Need we mention the connections between Israel which is enthusiastically supported by President Trump whose daughter is Jewish and the many, many Jewish attendees who are so against President Turmp. Sort of like birds who rip out their own feathers.

It’s no wonder President Trump refused to attend. He has more friends at any gas station than he has in Washington DC. Minhaj took his opportunity to teach those assembled about the dangers of discrimination but with sheer, unfiltered, nastiness — directed not just at Trump but also at top members of his administration — that Minhaj delivered along with his lessons.

Bottom line: The White House Correspondents’ dinner, the premier event of the Washington press corps, was two hours of mawkish self-celebration followed by 30 minutes of Trump-bashing. Minhaj should have been booed out of the room but the pack recognized one of their cubs.


The hatred of America was palpable and blindingly obvious. These were the largest collection of anti-American’s in the five states surrounding Washington DC as well as in Washington DC itself. Only Vladimir Putin was missing. So was the Stars and Stripes.


Greg Gutfeld slammed the liberal media’s White House Correspondents’ Dinner and praised President Donald Trump for choosing to bypass the event.

“He’s like the cool outcast at school who tells the snotty, rich kids, ‘I don’t want to go to your stupid party, I’ll throw my own, thank you very much! And I’m going to invite all my friends!’” Gutfeld said.

Gutfeld called Trump’s decision to hold a rally in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, a key swing state for Trump, a “stroke of brilliance” and referred to the Correspondents’ Dinner as an “orgy of preening self-importance.”  

Michelle Malkin thinks that Trump made the right move by not attending the “annual narcissism fest.”

“I thought that what Trump did, in leaving the swamp and doing that rally last night, was absolutely brilliant,” Malkin said on “Fox & Friends Weekend” this morning.