Apr 072017
 

Socialists demand people have a duty to counteract the “injustice” of nature which grants privileges to white people but denies those privileges to people of color by instituting the most obscenely unthinkable injustice which they named Socialism to deprive “those favored by nature” (i.e., the talented, the intelligent, the creative) of the right to the rewards they produce —and grant to the incompetent, the stupid, the slothful a right to the effortless enjoyment of the rewards they could not produce, could not imagine, and would not know what to do with if they did. Organized theft is more moral than Socialism.

When the word Socialism fell out of favor the Liberals re-named their flagship virtue “Progressivism”. It is progressive they believe to take what is earned by some people and give it to others in the name of “Justice”. 


What exactly is Justice? Is is a real thing” Is there something real in existence that gave rise to the concept of “Justice” Yes.
Quote: “The fact that man must draw conclusions about the things, people and events around him, i.e., must judge and evaluate them. Is his judgment automatically right? No. What causes his judgment to be wrong? The lack of sufficient evidence, or his evasion of the evidence, or his inclusion of considerations other than the facts of the case. How, then, is he to arrive at the right judgment? By basing it exclusively on the factual evidence and by considering all the relevant evidence available. But isn’t this a description of “objectivity”? Yes, “objective judgment” is one of the wider categories to which the concept “justice” belongs. What distinguishes “justice” from other instances of objective judgment? When one evaluates the nature or actions of inanimate objects, the criterion of judgment is determined by the particular purpose for which one evaluates them. But how does one determine a criterion for evaluating the character and actions of men, in view of the fact that men possess the faculty of volition? What science can provide an objective criterion of evaluation in regard to volitional matters? Ethics. Now, do I need a concept to designate the act of judging a man’s character and/or actions exclusively on the basis of all the factual evidence available, and of evaluating it by means of an objective moral criterion? Yes. That concept is “justice.”

“Justice is the recognition of the fact that you cannot fake the character of men as you cannot fake the character of nature, that you must judge all men as conscientiously as you judge inanimate objects, with the same respect for truth, with the same incorruptible vision, by as pure and as rational a process of identification—that every man must be judged for what he is and treated accordingly, that just as you do not pay a higher price for a rusty chunk of scrap than for a piece of shining metal, so you do not value a rotter above a hero—that your moral appraisal is the coin paying men for their virtues or vices, and this payment demands of you as scrupulous an honor as you bring to financial transactions—that to withhold your contempt from men’s vices is an act of moral counterfeiting, and to withhold your admiration from their virtues is an act of moral embezzlement—that to place any other concern higher than justice is to devaluate your moral currency and defraud the good in favor of the evil, since only the good can lose by a default of justice and only the evil can profit—and that the bottom of the pit at the end of that road, the act of moral bankruptcy, is to punish men for their virtues and reward them for their vices, that that is the collapse to full depravity, the Black Mass of the worship of death, the dedication of your consciousness to the destruction of existence.” see Atlas Shrugged and Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology both by Ayn Rand.

Apr 072017
 

He’s not the only one who is incorrect about the powers of the president to use the military. Danial Pipes who is usually correct in his judgments and conclusions said: “The immense resources of the United States should be…to . . reduce human suffering with blankets and soup.” Pipes is an appeaser. He has consideration for and compliance with. . . the unjust, irrational and evil feelings of others.
In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can profit.

“Justice is the recognition of the fact that you cannot fake the character of men as you cannot fake the character of nature, that you must judge all men as conscientiously as you judge inanimate objects, with the same respect for truth, with the same incorruptible vision, by as pure and as rational a process of identification—that every man must be judged for what he is and treated accordingly, that just as you do not pay a higher price for a rusty chunk of scrap than for a piece of shining metal, so you do not value a rotter above a hero—that your moral appraisal is the coin paying men for their virtues or vices, and this payment demands of you as scrupulous an honor as you bring to financial transactions—that to withhold your contempt from men’s vices is an act of moral counterfeiting, and to withhold your admiration from their virtues is an act of moral embezzlement—that to place any other concern higher than justice is to devaluate your moral currency and defraud the good in favor of the evil, since only the good can lose by a default of justice and only the evil can profit—and that the bottom of the pit at the end of that road, the act of moral bankruptcy, is to punish men for their virtues and reward them for their vices, that that is the collapse to full depravity, the Black Mass of the worship of death, the dedication of your consciousness to the destruction of existence.” Thanx Ayn Rand.

Apr 072017
 

President Trump sent missiles into the sovereign nation of Syria. Who or what could have stopped him? No one has the power to stop an American president who wants to use offensively, the military. The rules do not restrain nor restrict his military actions but, … Congress must approve the money.


But Congress approved the money for the entire military. It approved the naval destroyers and the missiles that rained down onto Shayrat airfield. They were fired within 30 minutes and hovered over Shayrat then hit within 2 minutes. Congress knew nothing about how the missiles would be used but they paid for them. President trump didn’t worry about getting approval in advance. He acted within his powers as Commander in Chief. No one could have legally stopped him. It was his decision and it’s been immensely popular.

President Trump did not go to war in Syria. Congress did not declare a war against Syria. They could do that but it wasn’t necessary to have done that for President Trump to order the missile attack.

President Obama made the unilateral decision to go to war with the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) while Congress has simply declined to weigh in on the matter. Kennedy went into Vietnam. President Truman did not go to Congress before he attacked Korea. Trump acted 100% legally when he sent the Tomahawks into Syria. Good Job Mr. President!!

Apr 072017
 

Saved lives said The Standard. “..Trump saved more lives by his action than Obama did in all his years in office.

And the strike was done while Chinese president Xi (Shee) was in Florida showing China, Russia, North Korea and all of America’s enemies in the United Nations that president Trump and America will act alone. Vladimir Putin is re-evaluating his relations with America with the knowledge that the Obama years of passivity are gone. When next the Iranians consider swarming around an American ship in the Gulf, or Putin flying military jets over the decks of American naval ships they better think about what president Trump and America may do.

Of course this was an easy lift militarily: a few dozen missiles, one air base as a target. Yet our previous president refused to do it; this one acted. He did not let worries about the possible Russian reaction scare him off. He understood that this would not end the war in Syria, but he did it anyway. He was willing to act alone, without demanding a UN Security Council meeting or congressional vote. And of course, leadership pays off: he will have strong bipartisan support on the Hill.

Henceforth when he speaks of American conditions and demands, interests and desires, more attention will be paid. Every official in every foreign government has been trying to figure him out since November 8. This week he gave them a lot to think about. He took command, and issued orders. He didn’t draw a red line and then withdraw it, but instead called Assad’s action intolerable—that overused word—and then proceeded to show that when he said intolerable, he meant it.

Initial indications show this strike severely damaged or destroyed Syrian aircraft and support infrastructure and equipment at Shayrat Airfield, reducing the Syrian Government’s ability to deliver chemical weapons.

President Trump ended his speech last night with these words: “God bless America and the entire world. President Trump and America are now protecting everyone in the age-old fight of good against evil.

Apr 072017
 

The Unz Review website prints and therefore promotes the anti-Trump Russian who childishly calls himself the Sakar, a small bird of prey. Sakar-bird is afraid to mention his name.
He said this about our president: “express my total disgust with Trump and “the overcooked noodle he has been since, well, pretty much day 1 and ever since: flaccid, confused and spineless. And yeah, he appears be stupid alright, especially so-called “plan” to defeat Daesh.
Saker-bird mourned Fidel’s passing by putting an old photo of Cuba’s Dictator.
Harvard called Saker-birds webs
ite “a shameless click-baiting op and fake news source”. He also made list of “Sites That Reliably Echo Russian Propaganda”.
Saker-bird posted a photo of himself showing his Sufi-beard with a confused look on his puss.

So the confused bearded Saker-bird thinks President Trump started WWIII when all our president did was lob a few Tomahawks at some runways so planes taking off with Sarin gas bombs would have to take off somewhere else. Maybe they can go to the Vineyard of the Saker where they can meet-up with more little Saker-birdies..

 

Apr 072017
 

That was fast. President Trump led the entire civilized world by sending in 59 cruise missiles to destroy an airfield in Syria to show Assad he needs to stop gassing Syrians and other Arabs. Good.
Putin is sitting on his hands because he knows what President Trump did was right and should have been done years ago. Russia should have stepped up to stop Assad from gassing people. Instead Putin went along with the gassing. Why?

Putin is a small dictator. Russia is not the world power it was when it led the USSR. Indonesia has far more people, 250 million than Russia’s 143 million. So does Brazil with 250 million, India with 1.2 billion is eight times bigger than Russia and China with 1.3 billion is nine times bigger that Putin and Russia.

Of course more people don’t make a nation powerful. America with 319 million has the strongest and most advances military in the world but other countries have militaries large enough to be a problem when they go rogue.


Putin needs to show the Russian people he’s the boss. Russia is still a tyranny even though the Russian people have been desperately trying to gain Liberty which they never had under the Czars and the communists.

Putin however doesn’t trust the Russian people so he believes showing how powerful he is will help him keep power. So he backs Assad and works with Iran against America and Europe.
Putin’s power is partly a sham to keep him in power. Too bad for Putin that President Trump by opposing Putin and Assad in Syria just put Putin in short pants meaning his prestige has been lessened. .