Oct 212016

Of course Putin has Hillary’s 35,000 State Department E-Mails that she has refused to turn over to the State Department. So does China.

Judicial Watch reports: “There is no longer any question that Hillary Clinton’s email scheme jeopardized our national security.” No Question. She compromised America and she got away with it so much that’s she’s running for President. The woman has no morality. No moral code. Hillary has no problem lying and she’s been helped by the government itself.
We released new documents containing email correspondence between former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Gen. David Petraeus, in which she had what she termed “blackberry blues” over her inability to use her BlackBerry inside her secure office. The FBI recovered these new emails from those not turned over by Hillary Clinton.

These emails are government documents and not personal emails, as Clinton claims in defending her decision to not turn over 30,000 emails sent or received by her as secretary of state. The emails also show she knew about the security issues of her BlackBerry use (and yet denied recalling anything about it or refused to answer our questions).

In the newly obtained email exchanges, Clinton also told Petraeus, “If there is ever anything you need or want me to know, pls use this personal email address” – hr15@nullatt.blackberry.net – when corresponding with her. Petraeus, at the time of the email from Clinton, was the Commander of the United States Central Command, overseeing U.S. military efforts in critical areas, stretching from Northeast Africa across the Middle East to Central and South Asia, and including Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Egypt.

The new documents were among the nearly 15,000 Clinton emails discovered by the FBI, and obtained in response to a court order in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit for State Department records about Clinton’s separate email system (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:15-cv-00689)).

On January 28, 2008, only one week after becoming secretary of state, Clinton sent an email to Petraeus from her non-state.gov email account apologizing for her “tardy” response to his earlier email and blaming it on what she termed “blackberry blues”:

From: H [mailto:hdr22@nullclintonmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 9:33 PM
To: Petraeus, David H. GEN USA
Subject: Re: Follow up

David – Sorry to be so tardy in responding. I’ve had blackberry blues. I can’t use mine all day long since my whole office is a SCIF [Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility]. I don’t yet have a computer and I had to change my address and lost some of my traffic.

(The State Department represented to a federal court that Hillary Clinton did not have a State Department computer.)

Shortly before taking office, Clinton emailed Petraeus asking that he use only her personal email account when contacting her. At the time, Petraeus was the Commander of the United States Central Command:

From: hr15@nullatt.blackberry.net
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2009 3:57 PM
To: Petraeus, David H. GEN USA
Subject: Follow up

Dear Dave,

Thanks for giving me so much of your time the last two nights. I appreciated our conversations and enjoyed the chance to see you and Richard becoming acquainted. I’m looking forward to working w you both. If there is ever anything you need or want me to know, pls use this personal email address. All the best, Hillary.

Also included in the new emails is a response from Colin Powell to a January 23, 2009, message from Clinton detailing Powell’s warning to keep her BlackBerry use secret to circumvent federal records laws:

However there is real danger. If it is public that you have a BlackBerry and … you are using it, government or not to do business, it may become an official record and subject to the law….Be very careful. I got around it all by not saying much …

(The Powell email had previously been released.)

Our lawyers specifically asked about Clinton’s BlackBerry use as part of the twenty-five questions submitted on August 30 to Clinton as ordered by U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan (see especially her answers to questions 14, 15, and 16).

In December 2015, thanks to a federal court order, we released documents containing more than 50 State Department internal emails from 2009 and 2011 warning of serious security concerns involving the use by then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her staff of “highly vulnerable” BlackBerrys in the executive offices of the Foggy Bottom headquarters.

The discussion included a March 2, 2009, internal memorandum from Assistant Secretary for Diplomatic Security Eric Boswell in which he advised Clinton and her Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills of “the vulnerabilities and risks associated with the use of BlackBerrys in Mahogany Row [seventh floor executive offices] considerably outweigh their convenience.” Testimony by Cheryl Mills in separate Judicial Watch litigation suggests Clinton used her BlackBerry in her office’s Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF), despite security rules prohibiting the use of such devices in secure areas.

These new emails show the truth that the separate email system was never a matter of “convenience” for Mrs. Clinton. She wanted to hide her emails from the American people.

And her request to Petraeus while he was the Commander of the United States Central Command to communicate with her solely at her unsecure email address shows Hillary Clinton’s willful negligence in handling national defense information.

It’s now clear why she deleted or withheld so many and why Mrs. Clinton didn’t recall or declined to answer our questions about her email security.

New Emails Raise Questions about Hillary Clinton’s Sworn Testimony

Many Americans may be despairing as news comes out week after week of the FBI and Justice Department’s corrupted investigation of the Clinton email matter. But you can rest assured that your JW is on the case. Indeed, the latest from our own independent investigation might warrant the attention of honest law enforcement.

In her sworn responses to the questions in our written deposition, Hillary Clinton said she “did not recall” communicating with her IT specialist about her clintonemail.com account. Inconveniently for her, we now have emails making that excuse look rather flimsy.

We just released another batch of State Department documents uncovered by the FBI. The emails included reveal direct communications between Clinton and her top IT specialist, Bryan Pagliano, about clintonemail.com management problems.

Clinton claimed under oath that she “does not recall having communications” with Pagliano relating to the email system. Clinton’s emails to Pagliano, who installed and maintained the clintonemail.com computer system in the Clinton’s New York home, relate to email management problems with Clinton’s BlackBerry.

The FBI recovered these emails from those not turned over by Hillary Clinton. These new emails are government documents and not personal emails as Hillary Clinton claimed in defending her decision to not turn over 30,000 emails sent or received by her as Secretary of State.

The new documents were among the nearly 15,000 Clinton emails discovered by the FBI and obtained in response to an April 8, 2016, federal court order directing the Department of State to begin producing materials for Judicial Watch in response to a September 3, 2015, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:15-cv-01441)). The lawsuit was filed after State failed to comply with an August 5, 2015 FOIA request seeking information about Bryan Pagliano’s involvement with Clinton’s email system.

Several “Test” messages were sent between Pagliano, Clinton, and her then-Deputy Chief of Staff Jon Davidson on September 2, 2011. And on March 2012 Clinton writes to Pagliano, “Once again, I’m having BB [BlackBerry] trouble”:

From: H

Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2012 8:45 AM

To: Justin Cooper, Bryan Pagliano [Cooper was a senior advisor to Bill Clinton]

Cc: Oscar Floras [manager of Clinton’s New York home]

Subject: Help!

Once again, I’m having BB trouble. I am not receiving emails although people are getting ones I send but I get their replies on my IP. I’ve taken out the battery and done what I know to do but with no luck yet any ideas?


From: H

Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2012 8:54 AM

To: Justin Cooper

Cc: Bryan M. Pagliano, Oscar Flores

Subject: Re: Help!

Thanks, Justin. How does that happen. do I need to do anything?


From: Bryan Pagliano

Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2012 10:32 AM

To: H

Cc: Justin Cooper, Oscar Flores

Subject: Re: Help!

Let me take a look at the server to see if it offers any insight. iPhone is not much different from iPad, however in both cases the security landscape is different from the blackberry.



From: H hdr22@nullclintonemail.com

Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2012 11:44 AM

To: Justin Cooper

Cc: Bryan M. Pagliano, Oscar Flores

Subject: Re:

Thanks again. I’m back in business.

On October 13, 2016, we released Clinton’s responses given under oath to 25 questions we posed as ordered by U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan in separate litigation. The final question reads:

Identify all communications between you and Brian Pagliano concerning or relating to the management, preservation, deletion, or destruction of any emails in your clintonemail.com email account, including any instruction or direction to Mr. Pagliano about the management, preservation, deletion, or destruction of emails in your account when transferring the clintonemail.com email system to any alternate or replacement server. For each communication, identify the time, date, place, manner (e.g., in person, in (e.g., in person, in writing, by telephone, or by electronic or other means), persons present or participating, and content of the communication.

Clinton’s response:

Secretary Clinton objects to Interrogatory No. 25 on the ground that it requests information that is outside the scope of permitted discovery for the reasons set forth in General Objection No. 5. Secretary Clinton further objects to Interrogatory No. 25 on the ground that the word “management” is vague. Secretary Clinton further objects to Interrogatory No. 25 insofar as it requests information related to alternate or replacement servers used after Secretary Clinton’s tenure as Secretary of State. Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Secretary Clinton states that she does not recall having communications with Bryan Pagliano concerning or relating to the management, preservation, deletion, or destruction of any e-mails in her clintonemail.com email account. [Emphasis added]

Clinton also claimed she “does not recall” 20 times in her responses given under oath.

In addition, Judicial Watch deposed Bryan Pagliano in June. He invoked his Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate himself more than 125 times, including:

Q. During your tenure at the State Department, did you communicate with Secretary Clinton by e-mail?

A. On the advice of counsel, I will decline to answer your question in reliance on my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

These newly exposed emails leave little doubt that Hillary Clinton was less than forthright and misled the public when she wrote, under oath, that she ‘does not recall’ communicating with Bryan Pagliano about her email scheme. Again, no wonder Clinton and her agents deleted these emails time and time again. And remember: these smoking gun emails would never have seen the light of day but for Judicial Watch’s federal lawsuits.

Lessons for Trump from the Clinton Scandals

Hillary Clinton isn’t the only politician who should heed our leadership on transparency and accountability. Donald Trump should also err on the side of disclosure. In that regard, Micah Morrison, our chief investigative reporter, has put that idea to paper in The Wall Street Journal. Micah covered the Clinton scandals for the Journal editorial page from 1994 to 2002 and is co-editor of the six-volume series, “Whitewater: A Journal Briefing.”

Here are excerpts from his article.

A generation ago, as the 1992 presidential campaign heated up, The Wall Street Journal asked: “Who Is Bill Clinton?” The country “will get to know, or try to get to know, Bill Clinton and Hillary,” the Journal noted. “The Gennifer Flowers tank has already rumbled by. But where’s the rest of them?”

Not far behind, as it turned out. Eight years of scandal and suspicion followed: Whitewater, Travelgate, the firing of all U.S. attorneys, the death of a White House deputy counsel and the jailing of a Justice Department associate attorney general, vanishing documents, congressional hearings, independent counsels, lurid allegations from Arkansas, 1996 campaign-finance misdeeds, Paula Jones, Monica, impeachment, the Marc Rich pardon.

Today, with his campaign staggering but the presidency perhaps still within his grasp, Donald Trump should consider the central lesson of the Clinton years: Scandal compounded by secrecy blots out the political sun. Opposition to the Clintons quickly coalesced as the media, members of Congress and outside groups seized the moment.

Mr. Trump promises it won’t be business as usual if he is elected president. But the same scandal-industrial complex that hemmed in his predecessors will quickly engulf him unless he makes some bold moves.

The most transformative solution would be to embrace radical transparency. Mr. Trump should immediately release his tax returns. He should direct the FBI and CIA to release any files it has on him. He should instruct his lawyers to stop acting like a defense team and embrace freedom-of-information practices. And he should appoint a transparency czar to ensure that his campaign and a future Trump administration will operate in an open and accountable manner. That would be a real revolution in Washington.

A truly transparent, accountable administration-in-waiting would not be just good policy, it would also be good politics. A massive document dump late in the campaign would electrify the media and shift the onus to Mrs. Clinton. The contrast with the secretiveness of the Clinton campaign and the lack of transparency in the Obama administration would be stark.

Judicial Watch won’t tell you (and can’t tell you) who to vote for, but we can tell politicians of both parties that they should respect the American people and end the practice of the modified limited hang out of potentially harmful information. Trust in politics is a two-way street. If they want the trust of Americans, they should first trust voters to evaluate fairly key background information.

Tom Fitton

Oct 212016

When the people no longer accept the political legitimacy of it’s government they revolt which explains the popularity of Donald Trump.

The Liberals began importing Democrat voters when Democrat Jimmy Carter embraced the Mariel Boatlift as legal immigrants. Miami and Florida became solidly Democrat. That also explains Obama’s encouragement of Mexicans and others to cross the American border however they can. Illegal immigrants get drivers licenses which registers them to vote Democrat. America’s massive Welfare System has offices outside America including in Central America to encourage more immigrants to come to America and register Democrat. The government has no sensitivity about how detestable that is to Americans.

he political establishment and the government they control have no idea how contemptible they have become but over half of the people look at government the way they looked at King George III. Trump has appeared bathed in light to take down the Liberal Democratic Party Left. The establishment Democrats must try to stop him just as King George III tried to stop the rebels at Lexington and Concord. Trump is the modern equivalent of George Washington.
When he refused to say he would accept the results of an obviously corrupted election process from the Liberals and their Propaganda Machinery that gets direction from Washington, Donald J. Trump accepted his role as the leader of the revolt just as George Washington in 1775 accepted his role to lead the Continental Army in rebellion against the King.

It’s not Donald J. Trump the Liberals should fear, — it’s the people.

The question isn’t why Donald Trump continues to draw large crowds while Hillary doesn’t. The question is why are so many people so angry? The answer of course is they are tired of being victimized and condemned by government so the people are seriously angry and rebelling against the failed policies of the Liberal Left and the Democrats. The time for Trump is right now.

Oct 212016

It’s not hard to sell-out one’s values over abortion. The Catholic Church did it when they continued to support Pro-Choice Mayor Bloomberg, Mayor DiBlasio, Obama and Hillary. Tom McArdele wrote: 

Sandy Newman, president of Voices for Progress, for instance, emailed Clinton campaign chief John Podesta complaining of the Church’s ban on contraception and hoped for “a Catholic Spring, in which Catholics themselves demand the end of a middle ages [sic] dictatorship.”

Podesta replied, “We created Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good to organize for a moment like this … likewise Catholics United.” Another email found John Halpin of the Center for American Progress mocking the Church’s “severely backwards gender relations” and charging that Church leaders “throw around ‘Thomistic’ thought and ‘subsidiarity’ and sound sophisticated because no one knows what … they’re talking about.”

The two parties’ presidential candidates aren’t the only ones in the spotlight at the Al Smith Dinner whose presence hurts the Catholic Church’s moral authority. In 2012, the master of ceremonies was MSNBC host Chris Matthews, a speechwriter for President Jimmy Carter and chief of staff to House Speaker Tip O’Neill, both of whom supported abortion rights, O’Neill then being the highest-ranking Catholic in the U.S. government.

It apparently doesn’t matter that Matthews considers the Catholic position on abortion“fascistic.”

The overall message the Al Smith Dinner now sends to Americans, Catholic and non-Catholic alike, is that Catholic teachings on human life and marriage can’t be allowed to muss relations between the Church and an increasingly anti-Catholic state. But in both 1996 and 2004, the abortion-friendly position of first Bill Clinton and then Catholic Democrat nominee John Kerry led to both parties’ candidates not being invited by the Archdiocese of New York.

As praiseworthy as the Alfred E. Smith Memorial Foundation’s work on behalf of poor children continues to be, it may be time for the famed event that raises so much money for that institution to stop breaking bread — permanently — with politicians with whom Catholic Democrat Al Smith himself might well be ashamed to be seen.

Oct 212016

Timothy “Cardinal” Dolan sat between Donald Trump and Hillary. Melania sat next to her husband but Bill wasn’t invited because of his pro-choice stand on abortion. Neither candidate is catholic but Trump is against a woman’s right to choose what goes on in her own body so he is far more acceptable to the Catholics than Bill, Hillary or the Democrats. Obama wasn’t invited either. He’s too low for the Catholics. Cardinal Timothy Dolan personally invited President Barack Obama.

Obama, who has waged war on God, the Catholic Church, and the natural law, is the most pro-choice president in the history of this nation.

Inviting Hillary presented a moral conflict for the scruples of Cardinal Dolan. He wanted to invite Trump but not Hillary but he also wanted to honor Trump by inviting Melania. Dolan’s solution was to snub ori-choice Bill Clinton who was never invited in the past so Dolan had a virtual no-brainer. Snub Bill.

Hillary’s emails talked very disparagingly about Catholics. Quote: “On February 10th 2012 Sanford “Sandy” Newman who is Jewish and admits he does not know much about the Catholic Church emailed John Podesta claiming The Leadership Of The Catholic Church Was “A Middle Ages Dictatorship.” Secret infiltration of the Catholic Church by Newman and Podestra is confirmed thusly: “This whole controversy with the bishops opposing contraceptive coverage even though 98% of Catholic women (and their conjugal partners) have used contraception has me thinking . . . There needs to be a Catholic Spring, in which Catholics themselves demand the end of a middle ages dictatorship and the beginning of a little democracy and respect for gender equality in the Catholic church.

Contraceptive and abortion coverage are the issues around which that could happen. The Bishops will undoubtedly continue the fight. Does the Catholic Hospital Association support of the Administration’s new policy, together with ‘the 98%’ create an opportunity?” (Sandy Newman Email To John Podesta, “Re: Opening For A Catholic Spring? Just Musing,” John Podesta Wikileaks, 2/10/12. Archbishop Charles Chaput of Philadelphia called “the contemptuously anti-Catholic emails exchanged among members of the Clinton Democratic presidential campaign team” disclosed by WikiLeaks. The high-ranking campaign operatives discussed Catholic front groups established by liberal Democrats with the revolutionary goal of overturning Catholic moral teachings on life and marriage.

Podesta assures Newman to rest easy for he and his progressive pals have already created in secret clandestine organizations explicitly designed to infiltrate the Catholic Church with progressive ideology. In 1992 Sandy Newman hired Barack Obama to be Project VOTE’s Illinois State Director.

Oct 202016

Death is a time for grieving and reflection. When a Supervisor of 30 years passes, most people hold with : “De mortuis nihil nisi bonum”, never say anything ill about the dead but there are exceptions. The very human attribute of reflection is stilled until an appropriate amount of time has passed but with the effusive praise given Mr. George Komelasky in the Northampton Township booklet one should ask about the other side of the story.

George was a Republican Insider and as such he had additional powers not typically granted to an elected official. Not all of those powers were benevolently exercised. Nor were they exercised evenly against friends and foes. Most people sing only praises at the funeral oration, and inscribe only what is to his advantage on the tombstone. We ask: Why is this consideration for the dead, [which they really no longer need], more important than the truth?
In Julius Caesar (1599) by William Shakespeare, Mark Antony uses the opposite idea, when he says: “The evil that men do lives after them.”
What is the truth about George Komelasky?
What about the people who “had to buy insurance” from Georges company? We ask that.

Bonds for local and state governments were or at least were rumored to have been “directed”. .

He kicked over my campaign signs and carried them away. The constable told him to put them back up.

The Mill Race restaurant and “downtown Holland” has been and still is “a mess” Why?
Partly because Wawa, a large corporation that had purchased the Holland Shopping Center and evicted the tenants was told: either construct another lane on Holland Road or they won’t get a permit to expand. They didn’t. The tenants were invited back by Wawa. The expansion was halted. Wawa had no interest in fighting the permit battle against the powers in Richboro.

Same for the Mill Race Inn, a large building that’s in excellent structural shape was told they wouldn’t get permits and the local board of Supervisors condemned a structurally sound structure. They used eminent domain to pay a fraction of the value of the land and buildings. the taxpayers swallowed the eminent domain payment and the building was given to the County to sell. That was three years ago.

A RiteAid store wanted to build a store at Rocksville and Buck roads but was stopped by obnoxious permit requirements, some of which were designed to be obnoxious and needlessly expensive. the field is still a field. Northampton residents didn’t get the convenience of a RiteAid because of Northampton government.

A business wanted to build a plain vanilla building in a Northampton Industrial park. Northampton government kept changing the requirements taking up time and at $5,000 per change to redesign the blueprints each time the township demanded more change. The business was forced to comply.

A Richboro business was not allowed to build a stairway down to a door on the lower part of their building.

Another Richboro business was forced to pay a $500 fee per tree to remove their own trees from their own lot before Northampton would give them permission to build their new building. the trees were where the building was to be built.

The township tried to get a homeowner to pay $2,000 for permission to rebuild their home in the same place as the previous building.

A homeowner in Hillcrestshire replaced their macadam driveway with attractive blocks. When they went to the township for a permit they had to pay $1,000. When the homeowner asked why they charge so much they were told: “because we can”.

And what about the most useless structure in all of Bucks County, the Bocce Ball court complete with an expensive roof structure that’s just about never used unless the government decides to play some seniors? Why did the supervisors approve such an obvious wast of time, money and common sense?

There’s a lot more corruption, pay-to-play, conflicts of interest, insider deals, chaos, false letters from Committee People, and waste, — see Wayne Mills: “What’s Wrong With Northampton” written in 2011, five years ago that’s on this website but now perhaps there will be a little less than before.

Oct 202016

He scored more direct hits. Called her a liar. Boom! Said she talks but doesn’t get anything done. Bam! Compared his Foundation to hers. His gives 100% to charity, hers 80%. Bang! She is portrayed as untrustworthy and out of touch. Boom-Boom! Her phony pneumonia diagnosis has brought questions about her health to the forefront. Bang-Bang!

Trump kept landing blows – on Washington corruption and Clinton scandals – that will resonate with viewers. Trump had strong moments- particularly when criticizing Hillary’s record as secretary of state. Boom, Boom, Boom!
He was calmer than the first two debates, had clearly prepared somewhat on policy and executed a couple of entertaining “zingers” against his rival. Hillary is a cosmological blunder. Trump is a cosmological imperative. He’ll be the next President because he’s the best candidate.

He scored points when he lacerated the Clinton Foundation for taking millions of dollars from Middle East countries “that push women off buildings” and the Obama administration for creating the power vacuum in Iraq that led to the emergence of ISIL. He also caught Clinton in a bit of naked obfuscation when she tried to turn a question about open borders into a condemnation of Trump’s alleged affection for Vladimir Putin.

His biggest blow was his charge that the election is “Rigged”. POW! When you turn on public TV and see six pundits–three conservatives and three liberals–and all six turn out to love Hillary and hate Trump; you can be certain that the election is rigged, because that’s what rigging is. Instead of providing background information about the candidate’s position on the issues so voters can make an informed decision, the media uses opinion makers to heap praise on Hillary while savagely denigrating Trump. That’s Rigging, Full Time – Big Time. The goal is to shape public opinion in the way that best suits the interests of Hillary. The ruling class unanimously backs Hillary Clinton because they know Trump will upset their gravy train.
Hillary Clinton is the worst of the establishment politicos. She’s the most widely-reviled candidate the Democrats have ever nominated, the embodiment of political corruption and cronyism. How is it, you may ask, that someone as boring and predictable as her was able to nab “upwards of $225,000 per speech” from Goldman Sachs if she wasn’t influence peddling? The huge sums of money prove beyond any reasonable doubt. Hillary has been selling access and influence in the backrooms of government.

“Hillary and Bill Clinton have accumulated a total of $153 million in speaking fees since Bill Clinton left the White House. Only the very naïve could believe that these vast sums were paid for the speeches themselves. They were payment for services rendered to the American financial aristocracy over a protracted period.” (In secret Goldman Sachs speeches, Clinton explains why the rich should rule, World socialist Web Site)

Get the picture? Hillary Clinton isn’t a candidate, she’s a franchise, a walking ATM machine. Easily the most corruptible, irritating and contemptible person to run for President. the Democratic party should apologize to the American people for nominating a career criminal as their candidate. Her performance at the three debates proved at least that.

Trump is using all his influence to discredit this fake democratic system the elites have painstakingly put together to control the public. He’s going to grow his throng of angry supporters into a small army, and he’s going to spearhead a (mainly) right wing populist movement that is going impose gridlock on Washington, deepen the political divisions, acrimony and polarization across the country, and drain the swamp that’s Washington DC, aka. The Establishment; both parties and the crooked media. The media is very scared he might win and are going insane. What are they afraid of? The media are very frightened that Trump might win and are going insane. They know Trump will not put up with their distortions of the News.

The Drudge Report showed the voting results: 81% Trump, 19% Clinton. Frank Luntz’s focus group showed Trump on 14 to 12. Left wing reports showed lower %’s for Trump.

Why can’t Hillary wear feminine, female clothes.? OK, she’s a wide end. We get that but plenty of feminine skirts, dresses and suits are easily available. She could wear woman’s clothes at least sometimes. Why is she afraid of skirts? use skirts, not pants. And what’s up with her teeth? What’s going on with her eyes? Something’s up. Some kind of robotic open-eyed squinting. What about her overbite? takes her lips a bit longer to cover her two front teeth. Don’t blame us, — she kept showing her teeth and reflexively, defensively grinning instead of acting serious. All talk, no action. Say a lot do almost nothing. Don’t defend Benghazi. Four Dead Americans. Lie about it.
Hillary is so over.

Oct 192016

Death is a time for grieving and reflection. When a Supervisor of 30 years passes, most people hold with : “De mortuis nihil nisi bonum”, never say anything ill about the dead but there are exceptions. The very human attribute of reflection is stilled until an appropiate amount of time has passed but with the effusive praise given Mr. George Komelasky in the Northampton Township booklet one should ask about the other side of the story.

George was a Republican Insider and as such he had additional powers not typically granted to an elected official. Not all of those powers were benevolently exercised. Nor were they exercised evenly against friends and foes. Most people act as if they are justified in singing only praises at the funeral oration, and inscribe only what is to his advantage on the tombstone. Why is this consideration for the dead, which they really no longer need, more important to us than the truth?

In Julius Caesar (1599) by William Shakespeare, Mark Antony uses the opposite idea, when he says: “The evil that men do lives after them.

Oct 192016

It’s why the contrarian law of nature doesn’t exist. Only the natural world exists and only Trump can be the next President, so say the bettors, the people who put their money down to reinforce their convictions and predictions. A Trump victory will pay will pay 4 to 1, $100 for a $25 bet.  

The odds are similar to the Brexit odds. Fortune magazine wrote:  “the polls aren’t as accurate as you think”. 

Foreign bettors don’t have anything at stake so they are more analytical. they note “the media got trumps Primary win all wrong all over the place. They said the guy has no chance, – that he was doing this as a joke. they were all wet and all wrong. 

We’ve been watching the left wing media B/S for years and we see through it. We know polls are designed to push people into voting for their candidate. Completely unreliable. Liars like Hillary. 

Oct 192016

McGinty’s going to win because Toomey doesn’t understand this loyalty stuff. Loyal Republicans will vote for Trump. Doesn’t matter if they like him or not, he’s the candidate, he gets the vote. Not so fast says Toomey. “I’m not endorsing him”. Traitor.

Pat “Flip-Flop” said: “I could never support Hillary.” Yeah, so who will he vote for? If he doesn’t vote for Trump, that helps Hillary because it means Hillary needs one less vote to win. If he doesn’t vote for Hillary, what’s the point of his vote?

Hey Pat: –There’s no third choice. It’s either-or, not none of the above. How brain dead is the man? A binary choice means Trump or Hillary. Only Trump or Hillary can win. Not voting is very un-American. Not voting is, well, it’s just dumb.

So plenty of Republicans will vote for Trump but not Toomey. Some may write-in a third candidate for the Senate as a protest against Toomey but the real Republican and Tea Party Protesters will vote for McGinty to show their disgust at a moral mediocrity.