Sep 222017
 

“Trump is Correct, John McCain is NOT A Hero”
By J. H. Holtz Written July 23, 2015. Read it HERE.
He’s a short, small, mean, nasty, hot tempered, vindictive,smart-ass progressive back stabber (ask Palin) and quick to pretend and project he is a nice guy. Look at how he back stabbed and treated Sarah Palin after HIS engineered massive loss of the presidency–and that loss was all caused by him alone.


He’s been living in the shadows of his illustrative father and grandfather. He crashed a jet aircraft after refusing to take standard evasive maneuvers which always worked so a missile removed part of his wing.

At the Naval Academy, he was known as a “rowdy, raunchy, underachiever” who resented authority, Cadet McCain became infamous for “off-Yard activities” and hard drinking parties. Robert Timberg wrote in his book, “The Nightingale’s Song”, that “being on liberty with John McCain was like being in a train wreck.”

McCain, a “below par” “a**hole” pilot, lost 5 military aircraft, the first during a training flight in 1958 when he missed the airport and flew his perfectly good jet into plunged into Corpus Christi Bay.

While deployed in the Mediterranean, the hard partying McCain lost a second aircraft. Timberg described the crash: “Flying too low over the Iberian Peninsula, he took out some power lines which led to a spate of newspaper stories in which he was predictably identified as the son of an admiral.”

Flight instructor McCain lost a third aircraft while flying a Navy trainer solo to Philadelphia for an Army-Navy football game. Timberg wrote that McCain radioed, “I’ve got a flameout” before ejecting at one thousand feet.

McCain lost his fourth plane on board the Forrestal on July 29, 1967 when, after an illegal “wet start” a rocket slammed into his bomb laden jet. The explosions that followed killed 134 sailors. McCain was transferred from the badly damaged Forrestal to the USS Oriskany. Shortly afterwards, on Oct. 26, 1967, he was shot down thereby destroying a fifth jet. McCain is a Bad News Bear.
developing

Sep 222017
 

Tucker Carlson is one of the most successful Americans on TV these days. TV is dominated by America-hating Left-Liberals. So are the movies and Rob Reiner is as representative of the Liberal-Left as Stalin was of the Soviet Union. Two bullies but Tucker put Reiner in short pants because Reiner and Morgan Freeman collaborated to release a video calling on the public to understand that Russia has attacked the United States’ democracy.
Tucker responded: “A lot of this is deeply disingenuous,” he said and reiterated that Reiner is suddenly taking the opposite tact that he and others in his group have in the past when it comes to warfare.

He asked Reiner to legitimize his claims against Russia while his group remains silent on the provable hacks and actions China has taken against the Department of Defense and other sensitive government agencies.

“You say nothing until Hillary Clinton loses, and then we’re at war,” Carlson said.
Why does Hollywood hate President Trump? Why aren’t they ever caught defending America?
Hollywood High-profile actors from Robert De Niro to Jane Fonda, Lily Tomlin, Julia Louis-Dreyfus and many others spoke out against the president-elect leading up to and after the election. They believe he is a con man even though it’s obvious the President hasn’t conned anyone and has been a work-a-holic since he took the Oath of Office.
Why does Hollywood hate con men? It’s their business. None of the actors portray themselves. They deal in the world of the Con. They practice how best to appear as someone they are not and get awards and accolades when they succeed in conning moviegoers.
Hollywood, represented by “Meathead” Reiner, hates success especially on the level to which President Trump has had both before becoming president and since. Hatred of the good because they are good.

Sep 212017
 

Respect for each person, except for the wayward souls who commit heinous crimes, is due to each and every person.

The question however has to do with superiority. Like Einstein who was smarter than the rest of us…. Like Copernicus;  Galileo, Da Vinci; Michaelangelo, Plato; Archimedes; and Aristotle who were clearly ahead of their cultures.

James D. Watson, 79, co-discoverer of the DNA helix and winner of the 1962 Nobel Prize in medicine, told the Sunday Times of London that he was “inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa” because “all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours — whereas all the testing says not really.”

Equal under the law means something different than equal in abilities and attributes. People say it would be terrible if we made all girls pretty,” Watson said. “I think it would be great.” 

In 2000, he told a lecture audience at U.C. Berkeley that there was a correlation between a population’s exposure to sunlight and its sex drive.

“That’s why you have Latin lovers,” Watson said, according to the San Francisco Chronicle. “You’ve never heard of an English lover. Only an English patient.”

The notion that intelligence tests and other scientific evidence shows that racial groups differ in intelligence, at least statistically, is not a new one.

It last gained popular attention in 1994 with “The Bell Curve,” a best-selling book written by Harvard psychologist Richard J. Herrnstein (who died before publication) and political scientist Charles Murray, which argued that intelligence was more important than socio-economic background or education in achieving success in American life.

The book does not explicitly ascribe a genetic, racial connection to intelligence, but; big, big but; Murray in his publicity tour to promote the book cited studies that human intelligence could be ranked by ancestry, with East Asians and European Jews leading the way.

That view was more clearly stated in 1995 by British-Canadian psychologist J. Philippe Rushton, whose “Race, Evolution and Behavior: A Life History Perspective” quantified dozens of differences between blacks, whites and Asians.

Sep 212017
 

After the election of Barack Obama, a mixed race child who self-identified as a black man, the white liberals of America were ecstatic. The end of white rule was upon us but Donald Trump upset their plans.

Not to be undone so easy, the white Liberal establishment went to war against President Trump, the white man who upset their plans to re-make America into a non-white ruled culture. Meryl Streep, Jimmie Kimmel, Hollywood, Bill Mahar, Black Lives Matter and traditional civil rights groups like the NAACP and National Urban League were incapable of preventing Trump’s election and don’t yet wield enough power to drive him from office.

Abraham Lincoln freed black slaves. A century later, President Lyndon Johnson embraced some civil rights reforms. The current and immediate battle is unique because it’s being waged almost exclusively among white Americans.

That’s in addition to the theme in University literature of the supposed unwillingness of white people to consider that black people study them as a separate race. Black American author James Weldon Johnson wrote in his 1912 novel The Autobiography of an Ex-Colored Man that “colored people of this country know and understand the white people better than the white people know and understand them”. Black author James Baldwin wrote and spoke extensively about whiteness, defining it as a central social problem and insisting that it was choice, not a biological identity. Yes, your race is a choice, at least to those who see problems with white people.

The destruction of Confederate monuments is against whiteness as is the hoped for destruction of Mount Rushmore, Stone Mountain and Washington DC. Mayor Bill de Blasio has ordered a review of all statues in New York city.

Writer David Horowitz draws a distinction between whiteness studies and other analogous disciplines. “Black studies celebrates blackness, Chicano studies celebrates Chicanos, women’s studies celebrates women, and white studies attacks white people as evil.” And: “You can try to mitigate your evilness, but you can’t eradicate it. The goal of White Studies is to entrench permanent race consciousness in everyone — eternal victimhood for nonwhites, eternal guilt for whites — most famously framed by WS chief guru, Noel Ignatiev, now teaching at the Massachusetts College of Art: “The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race — in other words, to abolish the privileges of the white skin.”

In 2001, historian Eric Arnesen wrote: “whiteness has become a blank screen onto which those who claim to analyze it can project their own meanings” and: the field “suffers from a number of potentially fatal methodological and conceptual flaws.”
Arnesen writes that the core theses of whiteness studies—that racial categories are arbitrary social constructs without definite biological basis, and that some white Americans benefit from racist discrimination of non-whites—have been common wisdom in academia for many decades and are hardly as novel or controversial as whiteness studies scholars seem to believe. Additionally, Arnesen accuses whiteness studies scholars of sloppy thinking; of making claims not supported by their sources; of overstating supporting evidence and cherry picking to neglect contrary information.

Arnesen notes that whiteness studies scholars are entirely on the far left of the political spectrum, and suggests that their apparent vitriol towards white Americans is due in part to white workers not fulfilling the predictions of Marxist theory that the proletariat would overcome racial, national and class distinctions to unite and overthrow capitalism. He cites, as an example, David Roediger’s afterword to the seminal Wages of Whiteness, which asserts that the book was written as a reaction to “the appalling extent to which white male workers voted for Reaganism in the 1980s.” Arnesen argues that in the absence of supporting evidence, whiteness studies often rely on amateurish Freudian speculation about the motives of white people: “The psychoanalysis of whiteness here differs from the ‘talking cure’ of Freudianism partly in its neglect of the speech of those under study.” Without more accurate scholarship, Arnesen writes that “it is time to retire whiteness for more precise historical categories and analytical tools.”

David Marcus wrote in May, 2016: “Progressive rhetoric on race has turned an ugly corner and the existence of “anti-white” attitudes can no longer be ignored.

“In the past year, all of the following headlines have appeared, in well-read publications:

The White Guy Problem
White Men Must be Stopped: The Very Future of Mankind Depends on It
I Don’t Know What To Do With Good White People
Ten Things White People Need To Stop Saying
Dear White People: Here’s a List of Things We’d Wish You’d Stop Doing
What is new is the direct indictment of white people as a race.

Marcus continues: “White people are being asked—or pushed—to take stock of their whiteness and identify with it more. This is a remarkably bad idea. The last thing our society needs is for white people to feel more tribal. The result of this tribalism will not be a catharsis of white identity, improving equality for non-whites. It will be resentment towards being the only tribe not given the special treatment bestowed by victimhood.
“It surprises many people that an increasing number of white Americans over the past decade believe whites now face more discrimination than blacks. “Increasingly, white Americans perceive that George Washington, Christopher Columbus, Thomas Jefferson, Jackson, and many other core white historical figures are consistently brought down a peg in order to decentralize whiteness in history. This assault on history has a deeper impact than many on the Left are aware of, or willing to admit.

“One of the key components to the success of anti-white racism is the almost-daily parade of silly micro-aggressions and triggers, specifically on college campuses. Conservative media seize upon disputes over the cultural appropriation of taco night or banning hoopskirts as evidence that minority racial grievance has gotten unhinged. Whites subjected to these barrages of anti-white sentiment are very aware of the dichotomy between non-white culture, which must be valued at all times (even in the midst of terror attacks), and white culture, which must be criticized and devalued. They don’t like it.
“The central theme is identity. That theme quickly calcifies into attitudes too brittle to hold up serious discourse. In reducing all phenomena to a question of race, both the alt right and the progressive left ensure the dominance of racial resentment as the lynchpin of our society.


Trinity College in Connecticut put black professor Johnny Eric Williams on leave, Professor Williams shared an article from Medium called “Let Them Fucking Die.” that argues: “indifference to their (white people) well-being is the only thing that terrifies” bigots, and so people of color should “Let. Them. Fucking. Die”


Matthew Hughey, an associate professor of sociology at the University of Connecticut and a friend of Williams’s, said Williams “was merely the latest target of a campaign by the right-wing white supremacist outrage machine with the goal of silencing academics” working to eliminate oppression.” Wrong, professor Hughey, Professor Williams in not working to eliminate oppression, he’s trying to punish white people. Can’t you grasp that? Of course not because you and professor Williams are part of the problem.

America has been racialized and pressure-cooked into a race-battle. How or when it will end are open questions which no one seems to know but it is certain that race in America has become a battleground.

Sep 212017
 

The cleansing of the Internet: the politically correct shut-down of websites that don’t confirm the PC Narrative; the internet controllers who hate white people; the Internet controllers that scrub and cancel websites and articles that don’t support the anti-white movement; all that and more is being done to force the narrative that white is hate and every other race and culture is better or superior or more just or even just and more equal than white people or European ancestored people. 
One huge example is a website that was scrubbed because it was judged to be white supremacist when all it did was present the evidence that was not white.

Sep 202017
 

No deal based on deception is valid. It’s an invalid contract. It’s void ab initio to use some legal jargon which means it was never a valid agreement.  Both parties must negotiate in good faith but bribing Iran with $1.7 billion delivered on pallets in cash makes the entire deal invalid. 

  • An invalid contract is a general term to refer to a contract that cannot be enforced for any number of reasons, such as duress, containing illegal promises, insufficient consideration, fraud in the inducement, or basically any aspect of the agreement that can invalidate part or all of the contract.

The Los Angeles Times reported: “Republicans have decried the payments as ransom, a charge the Obama administration has rejected. On Tuesday, a group of Republican senators announced their support for legislation that would bar payments from the Judgment Fund to Iran until Tehran pays the nearly $55.6 billion that U.S. courts have judged that it owes to American victims of Iranian terrorism.

“President Obama’s disastrous nuclear deal with Iran was sweetened with an illicit ransom payment and billions of dollars for the world’s foremost state sponsor of terrorism,” said Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), the bill’s primary sponsor.

Rep. Ed Royce (R-Fullerton), chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, also introduced a bill that prohibits cash payments to Iran and demands transparency on future settlements.

“Sending the world’s leading state sponsor of terror pallets of untraceable cash isn’t just terrible policy,” Royce said. “It’s incredibly reckless, and it only puts bigger targets on the backs of Americans. … This cash bonanza has emboldened Iran’s radical regime, and undermined America’s national security.”

Sep 202017
 

He’s an aging 57 year old irrelevancy who constantly grifts for other people to provide money for causes mostly for poor people about whom he won’t shut up to prove other super-rich people don’t give enough while he’s worth $600 million. He won’t help poor people with his own money which is why his net worth is $600 million and climbing. He gets richer and the poor are still poor. 

Salon ran a piece titled: “How U2 became the most hated band in America.” Their singer, Bono didn’t finish school which means he’s another rich little snot whose money cannot buy brains, education, wisdom, respect or height. He married another snot who hates things she cannot grasp such as nuclear power  . Journalist Ethlie Ann Vare commented that she looked “as out of place as a dairymaid in a brothel. They love Barack Obama and hate President Trump, ….of course. . . . It’s the wisdom thing.
Ali Hewson, Bono’s wife and her family live in Killiney, in south County Dublin, in an extremely expensive mansion with loads of property that overlooks the Irish Sea and that they expanded by purchasing the adjoining properties. Bill Clinton is among those who have stayed at the guest house there which is another set of reasons Bono hates President Trump who is much taller than Bone. . . . Bono.  
These celebrities constantly yak about the poor but it’s people like President Trump who have to provide the basis for the elimination of poverty which is not to waste time listening to Bono rant about the poor but to introduce free markets and get rid of the endemic corruption in places like Africa where Bono just doesn’t know what to do. Dumb guy.

Sep 202017
 

Allegedly, drafts of indictments against Hillary Clinton for her supposed involvement in the Whitewater issue, were written by Hickman Ewing, the chief deputy of Kenneth Starr, the independent counsel appointed to investigate Bill and Hillary Clinton’s alleged involvement in fraudulent Whitewater real estate dealings. Although others were sentenced for their role in the matter, neither Clinton was ever prosecuted. Ewing told investigators he drafted the indictments in April 1995.

Sep 202017
 

If you enjoy writing get a LAMY 2000 fountain pen as soon as you can. The experience is so unique you might want to copy your personal handwritten version of War and Peace. Reviews of the LAMY 2000 are all over the Internet. They are all true and may understate the glory of this fountain pen.

There are other exquisite fountain pens available, some handmade. The MAKI-E looks spectacular. Like a piece of jewelry that’s functional. See: Most Beautiful Fountain Pens In The World. . . Maki-i and Montblanc HERE on this website for more info.