Labron James is a great reason to never watch basketball.
He says he will not shut up and dribble but his words are empty of meaning. He really has nothing to say. He dribbles better than he thinks. In 2012 he was listed by Forbes as one of the world’s most disliked athletes.
He said he will “talk about what’s really important” when it comes to the state of race relations in America but he simply complains about race. He lists no problems nor does he have any solutions. HERE.
“I mean too much to society,” says this noxious braggart. “I mean too much to the youth, I mean too much to so many kids that (sic.)(…should be who) “feel like they don’t have a way out and they need someone to help lead them out of the situation they’re in.”
How exactly did Labron lead kids out of the situation they’re in?? How? What did he say? Did he tell them to quit high school like he did? Did he write a book about getting white people and black people together? Did he tell the kids to use gang signs and get 42 blurry tattoos that verify an identity crisis like he did?? Did he tell them to use correct grammar which he doesn’t do? Did he tell the kids to have three children before getting married like he did? Did he tell them that they should be six foot eight inches tall so they could play basketball and get paid $20 million a year?
While Lebron James is busy smearing the “divider” who currently occupies the White House, he is pathetically blind to the fact that former President Obama, whom he lionized for eight years, was the most calculating, unrepentant divider in the history of American politics. You’d have to be a pretty big dimwit to miss that, but Lebron James is more than up to the task.
Lebron, you see, views Obama as the anti-Trump: a uniter, not a divider. And perhaps he has a point. After all, who could ever forget the love of unity that Obama displayed by spending 20 years in the pews of a Chicago church pastored by Rev. Jeremiah Wright, one of the most vocal anti-American Jew-haters in living memory? It’s hard to imagine how anyone could have unified America-haters and anti-Semites more effectively than Rev. Wright.
LaBrom commends the anti-white, anti-cop, anti-conservative forces who are “bringing America together” by tearing it down, by disrespecting our history, our culture, our monuments and our flag by attacking white people and promoting thuggery.
Labron isn’t known for being a thinker. He’s never led a team to the championship either.
In March 2008, James became the first black man—and third man overall after Richard Gere and George Clooney—to appear on the cover of Vogue, posing with Gisele Bündchen. Some sports bloggers and columnists considered the cover offensive, describing the demeanor of James and his holding Bündchen as a reference to classic imagery of the movie monster King Kong, a dark savage capturing his light-skinned love interest.
He’s a thirty-three year old rather dumb man who plays professional basketball for a living. Very few people can do that. He isn’t known for deep thinking. Laura Ingraham is. He supported Obama and Hillary and seems to actually hate president Trump. He’s very divisive. He’s not a unifier.
That’s a very bad message to send to kids or to adults. Instead, they should ignore Labron, forget about basketball, stay away from drugs and go read a book.
We will never know the truth about liaisons between Donald Trump and the various women who are claiming something untoward happened between them and Trump. Never. Ever.
This is the classic “she said” accusation on the world stage about the best way to take down a man. Did it happen? We will never know.
$100,000 to $150,000, ve talking cosh money, seems to be the going rate to keep the women quiet. that’s high enough to be suspicious yet low enough that it could be affordable to Trump who has loads of cash and many people who will bag the money to the possible accusers.
True oe false, the president will continue to deny anything illicit happened.
We may hear from Melania but probably not. She may know something about the situations but it’s in her best interests to say nothing or to accept that the women are just gold-digging and her husband really, truly loves her.
Europeans and many other cultures have different attitudes towards dating, love, romance, fidelity and sex than Americans. many women, unlike most American women, will tolerate their husband’s mistress’s or affairs. A French woman said, “It is better to eat dirt with someone you love, than to eat chocolate cake alone.”
The non-American attitude toward marital infidelity has been colored by a very long history reaching back into the Middle Ages, when marriage was not an affair of the heart, but a matter of family alliances and property. In fact, the “invention of romantic love” in the 12th century was predicated upon the belief that love was not to be expected in marriage — for a variety of reasons — and could be found only in non-marital relations. Though French men have been known to indulge themselves more frequently than women in extra-marital affairs, French women, too, are no strangers to adultery. In fact, in literature the great myths of adultery — from Tristan and Iseut to Madame Bovary — are centered on women.
America however still has a moral attachment driven by the religious pilgrims who were extremely acetic about sex and it’s that attachment that’s driving the witch-hunt for women associated with Trump. So far it’s not working.
There’s armed security when Tiger Woods plays golf. The NFL and NBA would not dream of holding an event without layers of armed protection around and within the event. The political class would never entertain a gathering en mass without layer upon layer of armed protection, combined with pre-planned, protected means and routes of escape should an attack occur. And Hollywood elites, many of whom spend their off-camera minutes bashing the right to keep and bear arms for self-defense, enjoy gathering for award ceremonies that are protected by good guys with “machine guns,” “high capacity” magazines, armored transport vehicles, bomb-sniffing dogs, explosives and more.
But over 3,000 students and their teachers sat in Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School with only one armed resource officer in place.
One of the first duties of any government is to protect its citizens. America has a constitutional duty imposed on the government, … that would be on public school teachers to at least be armed to protect our children.
Teachers were on the scene. They showed loads of courage but none were armed. All were disarmed either by their Liberal foolish abhorrence of guns or that schools are in allegedly gun free areas. Time to get real here. The best way to protect is to at least be able to shoot back. One teacher with a small pistol would have deterred the shooter.
Remember the long Island Shooter? Shot up a trainload of people because no one except him had a gun.
There are many historic examples of disarmed citizens being oppressed and killed by their own government. The excuse given by authorities that they need to take guns away from citizens in order to lower crime rates is not supported by facts. Even if a government does not turn on its own citizens after disarming them, people are less safe – because unarmed citizens are easy targets to criminals. Over and over again, it has been clearly shown that taking guns away from citizens does not lead to a decrease in crime but rather a dramatic increase.]
Australia disarmed it’s citizens, and a year later the homicide rate in the largest province is up 300%. The burglaries of seniors is “dramatically” up.
The unique American 2nd amendment is essentially about the ability and the right to defend oneself and ones family. It doesn’t matter if that threat is a burglar, or the Federal Government. Having its citizens armed was the plain and simple intent of the founding fathers of our country.It is inhumane to demand that educators likewise be sitting ducks.
The debates on Race in America just increased in fire and fury with the release of the comic book based fictional movie Black Panther. At the heart of this racial conflict is Obama’s divisive presidency. One recent column by Peniel Joseph in the Washington Post chronicles Obama’s failure to stop the “open warfare” of racial conflict during his term in office but Obama increased the volume as anti-white rhetoric increased to shrill screaming.
Mistake it not. “Black Panther,” by contrast, is steeped very specifically and purposefully in its blackness and runs counter to MLK’s message: “I look to a day when people will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character” Character that’s ignored or forgotten by the opening day audiences who are so eger to embrace the skin color judgment.
“We came dressed in our African attire to show our support,” says Coleburn Bryant. “To be able to celebrate our culture and the beauty and style which you’ll certainly see in the film.”
On the opposite side of the earth, a majority of American whites say discrimination against them exists in America today, according to a poll released Tuesday from NPR, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.
“If you apply for a job, they seem to give the blacks the first crack at it,” said 68-year-old Tim Hershman of Akron, Ohio, “and, basically, you know, if you want any help from the government, if you’re white, you don’t get it. If you’re black, you get it.”
More than half of whites — 55 percent — surveyed say that, generally speaking, they believe there is discrimination against white people in America today. Black Panther will ratchet up the differences.
This war is about hate.
It’s between two opposed types of people. Those who understand the principles that founded America and those who hate America aka. The Left Wing Hoard. developing . . . .
During her February 15 broadcast, Ingraham slammed James for his “barely intelligible –not to mention ungrammatical — take on President Trump.”
Ingraham reported on James’ comments about Trump, which he made on the Uninterrupted “Rolling With Champion” podcast. During the podcast, James insisted that Trump doesn’t “give a f*ck about the people.”
“Well, the climate is hot,” James said. “The number-one job in America, the appointed person, is someone who doesn’t understand the people. And really don’t give a (expletive) about the people.”
James has spent the last two years attacking Trump at every opportunity.
But apparently it was all too much for Ingraham who was exasperated enough to exclaim, “Must they run their mouths like that?”
Ingraham went on:
“All right, we’re gonna create a new banner: ‘This is a dumb jock alert.’ NBA superstar Lebron James is talking politics again, and this time it’s R-rated. Here’s his barely intelligible — not to mention ungrammatical — take on President Trump in a new ESPN podcast.
Didn’t go to college. Didn’t Even Finish High School . .
. . But he’s free to run his mouth because America has a free speech policy that qualifies Labron as a speaker….not that he has to be heard or believed.
Ingraham continues: “I’m numb to this commentary, ‘like.’ Must they run their mouths like that? Unfortunately, a lot of kids and some adults take these ignorant comments seriously. Look, there might be a cautionary lesson in LeBron for kids. This is what happens when you attempt to leave high school a year early to join the NBA. And it’s always unwise to seek political advice from someone who gets paid $100 million a year to bounce a ball. Oh, and LeBron and Kevin, you’re great players, but no one voted for you. Millions elected Trump to be their coach. So keep the political commentary to yourself, or as someone once said, shut up and dribble.